Investment Planning

Investing vs. Paying Off Debt

Contributed by: Matt Trujillo, CFP® Matt Trujillo

20171024.jpg

You can use a variety of strategies to pay off debt, many of which can cut not only the amount of time it will take to pay off the debt but also the total interest paid. But like many people, you may be torn between paying off debt and the need to save for retirement. Both are important; both can provide a more secure future. If you're not sure you can afford to tackle both at the same time, which should you choose?

There's no one answer that's right for everyone, but here are some of the factors you should consider when making your decision.

Rate of investment return versus interest rate on debt

Probably the most common way to decide whether to pay off debt or to make investments is to consider whether you could earn a higher after-tax rate of return by investing than the after-tax interest rate you pay on the debt. For example, say you have a credit card with a $10,000 balance on which you pay nondeductible interest of 18%. By getting rid of those interest payments, you're effectively getting an 18% return on your money. That means your money would generally need to earn an after-tax return greater than 18% to make investing a smarter choice than paying off debt. That's a pretty tough challenge even for professional investors.

And bear in mind that investment returns are anything but guaranteed. In general, the higher the rate of return, the greater the risk. If you make investments rather than pay off debt and your investments incur losses, you may still have debts to pay, but you won't have had the benefit of any gains. By contrast, the return that comes from eliminating high-interest-rate debt is a sure thing.

An employer's match may change the equation

If your employer matches a portion of your workplace retirement account contributions, that can make the debt versus savings decision more difficult. Let's say your company matches 50% of your contributions up to 6% of your salary. That means that you're earning a 50% return on that portion of your retirement account contributions.

If surpassing an 18% return from paying off debt is a challenge, getting a 50% return on your money simply through investing is even tougher. The old saying about a bird in the hand being worth two in the bush applies here. Assuming you conform to your plan's requirements and your company meets its plan obligations, you know in advance what your return from the match will be; very few investments can offer the same degree of certainty. That's why many financial experts argue that saving at least enough to get any employer match for your contributions may make more sense than focusing on debt.

And don't forget the tax benefits of contributions to a workplace savings plan. By contributing pretax dollars to your plan account, you're deferring anywhere from 10% to 39.6% in taxes, depending on your federal tax rate. You're able to put money that would ordinarily go toward taxes to work immediately.

Your choice doesn't have to be all or nothing

The decision about whether to save for retirement or pay off debt can sometimes be affected by the type of debt you have. For example, if you itemize deductions, the interest you pay on a mortgage is generally deductible on your federal tax return. Let's say you're paying 6% on your mortgage and 18% on your credit card debt, and your employer matches 50% of your retirement account contributions. You might consider directing some of your available resources to paying off the credit card debt and some toward

your retirement account in order to get the full company match, and continuing to pay the tax-deductible mortgage interest.

There's another good reason to explore ways to address both goals. Time is your best ally when saving for retirement. If you say to yourself, "I'll wait to start saving until my debts are completely paid off," you run the risk that you'll never get to that point, because your good intentions about paying off your debt may falter at some point. Putting off saving also reduces the number of years you have left to save for retirement.

It might also be easier to address both goals if you can cut your interest payments by refinancing that debt. For example, you might be able to consolidate multiple credit card payments by rolling them over to a new credit card or a debt consolidation loan that has a lower interest rate.

Bear in mind that even if you decide to focus on retirement savings, you should make sure that you're able to make at least the monthly minimum payments owed on your debt. Failure to make those minimum payments can result in penalties and increased interest rates; those will only make your debt situation worse.

Other considerations

When deciding whether to pay down debt or to save for retirement, make sure you take into account the following factors:

  • Having retirement plan contributions automatically deducted from your paycheck eliminates the temptation to spend that money on things that might make your debt dilemma even worse. If you decide to prioritize paying down debt, make sure you put in place a mechanism that automatically directs money toward the debt--for example, having money deducted automatically from your checking account--so you won't be tempted to skip or reduce payments.

  • Do you have an emergency fund or other resources that you can tap in case you lose your job or have a medical emergency? Remember that if your workplace savings plan allows loans, contributing to the plan not only means you're helping to provide for a more secure retirement but also building savings that could potentially be used as a last resort in an emergency. Some employer-sponsored retirement plans also allow hardship withdrawals in certain situations--for example, payments necessary to prevent an eviction from or foreclosure of your principal residence--if you have no other resources to tap. (However, remember that the amount of any hardship withdrawal becomes taxable income, and if you aren't at least age 59½, you also may owe a 10% premature distribution tax on that money.)

  • If you do need to borrow from your plan, make sure you compare the cost of using that money with other financing options, such as loans from banks, credit unions, friends, or family. Although interest rates on plan loans may be favorable, the amount you can borrow is limited, and you generally must repay the loan within five years. In addition, some plans require you to repay the loan immediately if you leave your job. Your retirement earnings will also suffer as a result of removing funds from a tax-deferred investment.

  • If you focus on retirement savings rather than paying down debt, make sure you're invested so that your return has a chance of exceeding the interest you owe on that debt. While your investments should be appropriate for your risk tolerance, if you invest too conservatively, the rate of return may not be high enough to offset the interest rate you'll continue to pay.

Regardless of your choice, perhaps the most important decision you can make is to take action and get started now. The sooner you decide on a plan for both your debt and your need for retirement savings, the sooner you'll start to make progress toward achieving both goals.

Matthew Trujillo, CFP®, is a Certified Financial Planner™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Matt currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered.


You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.

Investment Commentary: 3Q 2017

20171013.jpg

This summer came and went with no shortage of topics for investors to worry about.  Low inflation, natural disasters, and geopolitical tension kept the headlines busy.  Despite all of this, the quarter ended on a positive note.  The uptick in markets was spurred on by a wide-spread pick up in global growth.  Recession risks continue to remain muted as dovish global central banks continue to inject liquidity in the system, or only very slowly begin to pull back on the injections.  In general, economic data remains strong.   We remain watchful for a slowing, particularly in manufacturing, business and consumer confidence, as these are early indicators of the tide of the economy turning. However, they are still positive.

Diversification is coming back into style as international and emerging markets continue to perform stronger than their domestic counterparts this year.  The S&P 500 Index ended the quarter returning 14.24% through the 30th of September.  International markets are truly the bright spot with the MSCI EAFE returning 19.96% and the MSCI EM Index returning 27.78%.  Bonds ended the third quarter with a respectful 3.14% return coming from the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index.

Rates remain unchanged

In September, the Federal Reserve (Fed) kept rates unchanged, but also announced additional information on how it will begin to unwind the $4.5 trillion balance sheet in October. 

The Committee intends to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve's holdings of treasury securities and agency securities--agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS)--by decreasing the reinvestment of the principal payments it receives from securities holdings. Each month, such payments will be reinvested only to the extent that they exceed a pre-specified cap. The caps will rise gradually at three-month intervals over a 12-month period and the maximum value of the caps at the end of the 12-month period will be maintained until the size of the balance sheet is normalized. (https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/policy-normalization-qa.htm)

This plan to shrink the balance sheet seems to reflect the Fed’s positive view of the U.S. economy.

blog3.png

Proposed tax changes being debated

Political stakes are high for President Trump to score a legislative win on what remains of his campaign promises.  In late September, he unveiled a proposal to slash taxes for individuals and businesses.  To simplify the tax code, Republicans have proposed condensing from seven tax brackets down to three (12%, 25% and 35%), doubling the standard deduction to help tax payers eliminate the need to itemize, and “significantly increasing” the child tax credit while also adding a new tax credit for the care of non-child dependents (elder-care situations).

Currently, many taxpayers use itemized deductions, claiming write-offs for things like charitable contributions, interest paid on a mortgage, state and local taxes. If the standard deduction becomes larger, fewer taxpayers will need to itemize, reducing the incentive to hold a mortgage or contribute to charity.

President Trump is also proposing to cut the corporate tax rate from 35% down to 20%.  A new tax rate would be established for pass-through entities which represent about 95% of businesses in the United States.  Generally when corporate tax rates are cut, markets perform very well in the year following the tax cut. The chart below demonstrates that after the rate cut for corporate taxes (Orange area below the line), the following 1 year returns on the S&P500 are quite positive (blue bar above the line).

Michigan 529 plan changes

In September, the Michigan 529 Advisor Plan, transitioned its program from Allianz Global Investors to Nuveen Securities, LLC.  Account numbers stayed the same and investments mapped over to similar strategies; if you had one of these accounts, the transition was seamless.  Some of the benefits of the change include an expanded investment line-up, more leading edge investment managers and lower fees.  If you have any questions don’t hesitate to reach out!

After several years of equity volatility near historic lows, this quarter we again experienced the speed and scale at which geopolitics can possibly move markets. We remain committed to the view that managing volatility is at the heart of proper portfolio design.  It is a responsibility we take very seriously and we thank you for the continued trust you place in us to help you with these decisions!

On behalf of everyone here at The Center,

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF®
Director of Investments
Financial Advisor

invcom_pulse_400x200-2.jpg

Investment Pulse: Check out Investment Pulse, by Nick Boguth, a summary of investment-focused meetings for the quarter.

invcom_phd_400x200.jpg
invcom_basics_400x200.jpg

Investor Basics Series: Nick Boguth, Investment Research Associate, talks about exchange rates.

invcom_ofnote_400x200.jpg

Of Financial Note:  Jaclyn Jackson, Portfolio Coordinator, shares a look at the asset flow for 3rd quarter.

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.


This information does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material; it has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making and investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk; investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Asset allocation and diversification do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index is an unmanaged market value weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset backed, mortgage backed securities with a maturity of at least 1 year. Please note direct investment in any index is not possible. Index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary.

Investor Ph.D: How Currency Movement Effect International Investments

20171012.jpg

Investors with the patience to hold on to their diversified portfolio that maintains a component of international have likely been rewarded this year.  Before this year, investors challenged the advice of diversifying their portfolio away from the U.S. as international investments, represented by the MSCI EAFE, noticeably lagged U.S. returns in recent years.  The chart below shows how the MSCI EAFE has performed vs. the S&P 500.  When the gray shaded area is above 0, this represents a time when the prior three years of returns have been dominated by the MSCI EAFE outperforming the S&P 500.  When you drill down into specific extended time periods when this happens, you can see that much of the returns come from the impact of the currency return (the lighter green portion of the return).  You see in recent years the S&P 500 has significantly outperformed international investments. 

A weakness in the U.S. dollar has contributed to the outperformance year-to-date by the MSCI EAFE (as of 9/30/2017 the MSCI EAFE was up XX% vs. the S&P 500 was up XX%).  When the dollar is in a cycle of weakening against foreign currencies, there is a natural tailwind helping performance.  Coupled with the global economy strengthening and political risks receding due to a failed populist movement in Europe, this could be a continuing recipe for international investing tailwinds.

Take a look at the impact on stock markets around the globe during these periods of different U.S. dollar trends:

When the U.S. dollar index is retreating, Foreign and Emerging markets have outperformed and vice versa.  If the U.S. dollar continues its current trend of weakening or even levels out, we could continue to see the performance story dominated by foreign investments.

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.


This information has been obtained from sources deemed to be reliable but its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Opinions expressed are those of Angela Palacios and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. There is no assurance the trends mentioned will continue or the forecasts provided will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. Please note direct investment in an index is not possible. Index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investor Basics: Exchange Rates

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth Nicholas Boguth

20171011.jpg

An exchange rate is just the price of one currency in terms of a different currency. For example, as I wrote this blog on 9/29/17, the USD/EUR exchange rate was .85. This means that 1 US Dollar would buy 0.85 Euro.

Exchange rates fluctuate though, and this is where things get complicated for investors. Inflation, interest rates, asset flows, trade, and economic stability are all factors that move exchange rates. Below is a chart showing just how much the exchange rate between the US Dollar and the Euro has fluctuated in the past 10 years.

blog 2.png

Now these exchange rates may not directly affect you in your day to day purchases, but if you are invested internationally, exchange rates affect your portfolio. Head on over to our Director of Investments Angela Palacios’s blog (coming on Thursday!) to read about exactly how exchange rates have affected returns recently.

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

Financial Note: Asset Flow Watch 2017 3Q

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson Jaclyn Jackson

20171010.jpg

One of the most common ways to monitor consumer confidence and investor sentiment is to watch fund inflows and outflows.  Market analysts use fund flows to measure sentiment within asset classes, sectors, or markets. This information (combined with other economic indicators) help identify trends and determine investment opportunities.

July trends picked up where June left off, as international equities and taxable bonds continued to receive inflows. 

Most of these flows came through passive funds, but active flows were still positive.  Conversely, US equities saw outflows as valuations appear to be fair or high (depending on whom you ask) and administration confidence declines.  Accordingly, The International Monetary Fund decreased their US GDP growth forecast from 2.3% to 2.1%.  In terms of internationals, investors are opting for developed markets through foreign large blend funds.  Ultimately, this is a play for Europe.  The International Monetary Fund increased its expected growth rate from 1.7% to 1.9% in Europe.   Investors also sought out emerging market funds as the MSCI Emerging Markets index has double-digit returns year to date (28.3% returns YTD at the end of August).

In August, international equity inflows were positive but less positive than in July. 

The slowdown reflects lackluster corporate earnings internationally and uncertainty about North Korea.  Nonetheless, internationals remain compelling to investors with rebounds from Japan and Europe progressing.  MSCI EAFE returns have remained ahead of the S&P 500 in 2017.  Taxable bonds, specifically intermediate-term bond funds, remained the leading category group for inflows. Intermediate bond funds hit the “sweet spot” for many investors because they are usually not as severely impacted by rising rates as long term bonds and typically generate more return than short term bonds.  From January 1st through August 15th, intermediate bonds gained 3.2% beating both the Bloomberg Barclays US Bond Index and 2016 returns.  Differing from June and July, investors are trending back towards active management for their bond funds.

blog1.jpg

As of writing this, October 4th, 2017, September flows mimic July and August with outflows from US equities and continued inflows to international equities and taxable bonds. 

There are also positive inflows for municipal bonds and alternatives.  Outflows from the US are mostly from growth (especially large growth) and US large blend funds.  International equities experienced outflows last week, but are net positive for the month.  Bond inflows are steady with investors largely continuing to invest in intermediate term bond funds as wells as modestly investing in high yield municipals funds and national intermediate municipal bonds.

Bonds Lead the Pack

Even as rates rise, investors continue to pour assets into bond funds. Why is that the case? Income and diversification seem to motivate the trend.  Even if interest rates rise and bond prices go down, investors still want the guaranteed income stream bonds provide.  Some may also feel they can pick up higher payouts from new bond issues as interest rates increase.  In terms of diversifications, investors have seen gains from their US equities and feel like it is time to rebalance into a true stock diversifier; bonds.

Jaclyn Jackson is a Portfolio Administrator and Financial Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®


This information does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material; it has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making and investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Asset allocation and diversification do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Barclays Capital US Aggregate Index is an unmanaged market value weighted performance benchmark for investment-grade fixed rate debt issues, including government, corporate, asset backed, mortgage backed securities with a maturity of at least 1 year. Please note direct investment in any index is not possible.

Investment Pulse: 3Q 2017

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth Nicholas Boguth

20171009.jpg

We’ve been busy here in the Investment Department! Check out some of our research highlights from the third quarter.

Angela Palacios, Director of Investments at The Center, attends Capital Group Advisor Forum

Angela traveled to Capital Group’s headquarters in California, to look under the hood at their investment strategies focusing on their process, people and investment outlooks.  You may know the strategies as the American Funds family. The discussion spanned from macro-economics to fixed income and equity discussions. On the macroeconomic front they discussed their recession outlook. Anne Vandenabeele, Economist, stated that expansions don’t die of old age, they die because imbalances build up in the economy or the Federal Reserve raises rates too quickly. They don’t see either of these scenarios right now. Most severe bear markets are when you have a bear market combined with a recession. While there may be a bear market in the next several years they don’t see a recession occurring at the same time. 

Clayton Shiver, Portfolio Manager at Stadion Money Management

Part of our investment process is to stay on top of investment products being offered in the marketplace. Nick Boguth met with Clayton Shiver to discuss Stadion’s alternative product platform and understand the team’s investment process. Clayton discussed their three sleeve alternative approach that included an equity, income, and trend sleeve implemented with the buying and selling of stocks and options in order to generate very different potential returns from the S&P 500 or Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index.

Matt Lamphier, Portfolio Manager at First Eagle

Matt Lamphier, director of research for the Global Value team at First Eagle Investment Management, joined us at our office for a jam-packed hour of investment updates. We discussed First Eagle’s investment process, outlook, and rationale behind their investments. Matt stressed the importance of being a value investor, and choosing companies that will outperform over the long term. One surprising statistic that Matt shared was that the average timespan of a stock in their portfolio is over 10 years!

What to expect next time…

We have a busy schedule next quarter and are looking forward to sharing highlights from our upcoming conferences including: Thornburg Investment Management, First Eagle, and Investment News.

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.


The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Raymond James is not affiliated with Anne Vandenabeele, Clayton Shiver, Stadion Money Management, Matt Lampier and/or First Eagle Investment Management.

Irma’s Devastating Winds Don’t Devastate The Market

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth Nicholas Boguth

20170926.jpg

Hurricane Irma, one of the strongest and longest-lasting hurricanes ever recorded, recently passed leaving a long path of destruction behind it. People from the Caribbean to Florida prepared for the beast of a storm prior to labor day weekend, but there is only so much that could be done before its 180+ mph winds tore through the Virgin Islands on Wednesday the 6th, Cuba on Friday, and finally Florida and Georgia by Sunday. Entire islands were left in shambles across the Caribbean, Florida and Georgia sustained major damage, and millions of people are left without power and water.

How did the market respond?

We are constantly reminded that the markets do not like uncertainty, and this rings true when you look at short periods of volatility, but look at all of the uncertainty that we’ve seen in the past 15 years. Since ’02, we’ve had 3 presidents from republican, to democrat, back to republican, Congress party control flipped multiple times, we’ve seen 2 major wars, devastating natural disasters, massive oil spills, major business and even city bankruptcies, and a “Great Recession”. What did the S&P 500 do over the past 15 years? It is up about ~9% annualized, which is right on par with the average return of the S&P over the past 100 years.

Reminder: be a long term investor. Do not try to time the market, and if you ever have any questions – we are here to help!

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.


The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

4 steps to our Due Diligence Process

20170912.jpg

My friend’s wife is constantly putting him on a diet. He often appeases her by ordering taco salads instead of a traditional entree.  She assumes he’s eating healthy, but little does she know: some taco salads can pack as many as 1,700 calories and over 100 grams of fat! His wife might need to do her homework.

As important as it is to the success of dieting to understand what you are eating, it is equally important to understand what you are buying when investing.  Once you have identified your appropriate mix of asset classes for your risk tolerance and time horizon (your strategic allocation), it is time to start doing your homework to identify the appropriate securities to fill each asset bucket. 

Here is a summary of the steps we follow at The Center:

  • Qualitative Review: We generate ideas through reading, conference attendance, peer networking and searches in Morningstar Direct.  The following criteria serve as a starting point.

    • At least $50 Million of Assets Under Management (AUM)

    • Manager tenure of 10 years or more

    • Bottom half of expense ratio in category

    • Manager invests in their strategy ($1 Million and up preferred)

  • Quantitative Review: We review the performance and risk characteristics of investment options within the category.  Criteria may include but are not limited to:

    • Review of rolling returns to identify performance standouts over different time periods – 1, 3, 5, and 10 years.

    • Review of performance during difficult time periods (bear markets or periods of performance difficulty for the asset category).

    • Review of rolling statistics including standard deviation, alpha, beta, Sharpe and information ratio relative to best-fit benchmarks.

    • Review of upside-downside capture.

    • Review asset flows by category and individual security.

  • Due Diligence Questionnaire & Manager Interview:  Center for Financial Planning’s Due Diligence Questionnaire is submitted to the short list candidates for completion.  Manager interviews for active strategies are conducted via phone conference or in-person interview. 

  • Mock-up in portfolios: Position is added into a mockup of the portfolio to identify if intended outcome is achieved and what degree of exposure is required to help attain the desired outcome (percent allocated within the portfolio).

You can also view a simplified graphic on this process:

20170912a.jpg

You can do your investment “waistline” a favor by doing your homework. Don’t be fooled by taco salads, make sure you are getting what you want when it comes to investing by having a defined buying process, or talking to your financial planner about establishing one that is appropriate for you!

Angela Palacios, CFP®, AIF® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.


Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James.

Adjusting the Secret Sauce in your Financial Plan

Contributed by: Laurie Renchik, CFP®, MBA Laurie Renchik

Investing in your financial future is a journey that doesn’t start or stop at retirement. Creating financial independence to support your future is a work in progress practiced over a lifetime. While it is reasonable to assume that the approach for a 35-year-old may not be appropriate for a 55-year-old, there is a common thread that emerges regardless of age. As priorities shift and circumstances change, financial plans and investment portfolios need periodic adjustments to stay in sync with your life. If your life journey is anything like mine, some plans work out perfectly and others may require course corrections to stay on track. I have found that the secret sauce is not just THE financial plan; but rather the consistent financial planning process along the way.

Let’s consider a 55-year old with a plan to retire in five years at the age of 60. In this transition period, the focus is shifting from saving and accumulating to preparing to withdraw income from retirement accounts; commonly referred to as the distribution phase. Having the confidence to retire without worry of spending down the nest egg too quickly is a common concern for folks in this transition phase. Sustaining the nest egg especially in the face of events that are beyond control—like market corrections, changing economic backdrops, and business cycles—are why financial plans and investment management go hand and hand.

I have found that considering a range of “what-if” scenarios in order to address concerns before retirement is a productive approach to addressing an unknown future that could unfold during your retired years.

  1. Market corrections:  In the early years of retirement, a portfolio that goes down in value during a market correction may suffer initially and cause stress for the recent retiree.

    ACTION: Don’t panic. When things go in directions we don’t like, the natural inclination is to take action. To avoid a reactive response, start out with a properly diversified portfolio which includes appropriate asset allocation, ready cash on hand to support income needs, as well as a process for monitoring the big picture. Review your plan for confirmation.    
     

  2.  Inflation is higher than expected: With inflation, things cost more over time eroding the value of savings especially when considering a 30 or 40-year retirement.

    ACTION: We don’t know how much inflation will spike or fall in the future. Model a range of scenarios in your baseline income assumptions to understand the potential impact. Revisit the areas of rising costs in your plan as part of your review process. Your financial plan should be built to withstand uncertainties.
     

  3. Lower than anticipated market returns: A plan that is monitored consistently and customized to your long-term retirement goals can include the analysis and financial independence calculations to easily take into consideration lower than expected returns. 

ACTION: Build in a margin of safety in your baseline assumptions as a buffer to absorb the impact of lower than expected market returns. Put yourself in the best position to achieve your goals by prioritizing in advance where you can make incremental changes so that clarity and purpose are fundamental to your decision. 

Life has a wonderful, unpredictable way of introducing lots of sticky details into the mix. Your financial planner can help with the details and changes needed to take care of your nest egg by working with you to adjust the secret sauce as needed along the way.

Laurie Renchik, CFP®, MBA is a Partner and Senior Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® In addition to working with women who are in the midst of a transition (career change, receiving an inheritance, losing a life partner, divorce or remarriage), Laurie works with clients who are planning for retirement. Laurie is a member of the Leadership Oakland Alumni Association and is a frequent contributor to Money Centered.


Asset allocation and diversification do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.

Is it Time for You to “Come Clean” with Your Financial Planner?

20170824.jpg

Recently, I had an awakening experience with a long time client.  For years, my client has been very focused on investment returns and fees.  We began working together during the downturn in 2008 (he had been with the firm, but working with another planner for years before that).  This client is always worried about losing too much or not taking enough risk; when in reality, he needs no more than his current risk profile to help reach his goals.  I struggle to find ways to prove to him how solid his financial and investment plan is.

During our recent meeting, our conversation took a different turn than conversations of the past.  He got very emotional and disclosed to me that money really makes him very anxious.  He went on to tell me about some very personal things that have happened in his past, both with personal relationships and in his business life that made him distrust his ability to make good financial decisions.  To this day, he still gets nervous about every financial decision, and is never sure he is making the right one – he is always waiting for the something to go horribly wrong. 

Our meeting lasted much longer than normal and he apologized for “breaking down”.  I, in turn, thanked him for giving me the profound insight I needed to serve him better as his planner.  I now understand his view of money, and can find ways to address his fears and anxieties like I never could have before.  I thanked him for having enough trust in me to share his story.

Many of us have “money” stories that are not kind – those that cause us to feel fear and anxiety, and those that may still interfere with our ability to make rational financial decisions. 

If you have things in your history that you feel impact your financial decision making, share them with your financial planner.  With the understanding of your money fears, your financial planner will be able to assist you, on an even deeper level, in making the best financial decisions for your future.

Sandra Adams, CFP® , CeFT™ is a Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Sandy specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and is a frequent speaker on related topics. In addition to her frequent contributions to Money Centered, she is regularly quoted in national media publications such as The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine and Journal of Financial Planning.


Any opinions are those of Sandra D. Adams and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Every investor's situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.