Contributed by: Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®
Several years ago, after starting a new relationship with a newly widowed client, I received a confused phone call from her. She had received a communication from Medicare stating that her Part B & D premiums would increase significantly from the prior year. To make matters worse, she also noticed, while filing her most recent tax return, that she was now in a much higher tax bracket. What happened? Now that her husband was deceased, she was receiving less in Social Security and pension income. Her total income had decreased, so why would she have to pay more tax and Medicare premiums? Unfortunately, she was a victim of what’s known as the “widow’s penalty.”
Less Income and More Taxes – What Gives?
Simply put, the widow’s penalty is when a surviving spouse ends up paying more taxes on less income after the death of their spouse. This happens when a widow or widower starts filing as a single filer the year after their spouse’s death.
When the first spouse dies, the surviving spouse typically sees a reduction in income. While the surviving spouse will continue to receive the greater of the two Social Security benefits, they will no longer receive the lower benefit. In addition, it’s also very likely the surviving spouse will either completely or partially lose income tied only to the deceased spouse (ex. employment income, annuity payments, or pensions with reduced or no survivor benefits). Depending on how much income was tied to the deceased spouse, the surviving spouse’s fixed income could see a sizeable decrease. However, the surviving spouse starts receiving less income and is subject to higher taxes.
With some unique exceptions, the surviving spouse is required to start filing taxes as single instead of as married filing jointly in the year following their spouse’s death. In 2026, that means they will hit the 22% bracket at only $50,401 of taxable income. Married filers do not reach the 22% bracket until they have more than $105,700 of taxable income. To make matters worse, the standard deduction the widow will receive will be almost cut in half. In 2026, for a married couple (both over 65), their standard deduction will be $35,500. A single filer (over the age of 65), however, will only have a $18,150 deduction! Unfortunately, even with less income hitting the tax return, widowed tax filers commonly end up paying higher taxes due to the compression of tax brackets and the dramatic standard deduction decrease for single filers.
Another recent layer of complexity that can perpetuate the issue of the ‘widow’s penalty’ is the new ‘additional senior deduction’ that went into effect in 2025 and expires at the end of the tax year 2028. If a married couple is over the age of 65 and has an Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) of $150,000 or less, they will receive an additional $12,000 deduction that can offset income. For single filers, the deduction amount is only $6,000 and starts to phase out once AGI exceeds $75k. If one spouse passes away, not only will this deduction be reduced, but it’s possible the surviving spouse sees a dramatic decrease or complete elimination of the $6k deduction they’d receive because of the dramatically different income thresholds that apply to this new deduction.
Tax brackets are not the only area in which surviving spouses are penalized. Like the client in my story above, many surviving spouses see their Medicare premiums increase even though their income has decreased because of how the income-related monthly adjusted amount (IRMAA – ONCE BLOG IS UPDATED ON WEBSITE CREATE HYPERLINK) is calculated (click HERE to visit our dedicated Medicare resource page). Specifically, single filers with a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of more than $109,000 are required to pay a surcharge on their Medicare premiums, whereas there is no surcharge until a couple that is married filing jointly reaches $218,000 of income. This means that a couple could have an income of $130,000 and not be subject to the Medicare IRMAA surcharge, but if the surviving spouse now has income over $109,000, their premium will increase by almost $1,200 per year. In this same example, the widow could now be in the 24% bracket (as compared to the 12% bracket with $130k of income filing jointly) and be paying almost $12,000 MORE between increased Medicare premiums (IRMAA charges), federal and state of Michigan tax!
Proactive Planning
Short of remarrying, there is no way to avoid the widow’s penalty. However, if your spouse has recently passed away, there may be some steps you can take to help minimize your total tax liability.
For most widows, the year their spouse dies will be the last year they will be allowed to use the higher married filing jointly tax brackets and standard deduction. In some cases, it can make sense to strategically realize income during the year of death to minimize the surviving spouse’s lifetime tax bill. A surviving spouse might do this by converting savings from a Traditional IRA to a Roth IRA while they are still subject to the married filing jointly rates.
For example, let’s say I was working with a couple (we’ll call them John and Mary), and after several years in a long-term care assisted living facility, John sadly passed away at age 85. Because John and Mary did not have long-term care insurance, they incurred substantial out-of-pocket medical expenses, resulting in a significant medical deduction in the year of John’s passing. Several months after her husband’s passing, Mary suggests we convert over $100,000 from her IRA to a Roth IRA. Because this was the last year she could file jointly on her taxes along with the significant medical deduction that was only present the year John passed, Mary paid an average tax rate of 10% on the $100,000 converted. Mary is now filing single and finds herself in the 24% tax bracket, so converting the funds at a much lower rate may be beneficial depending on each individual’s situation.
I believe the widow’s penalty should be on every married couple’s radar. While it’s possible that while both spouses are living, their tax rate will always remain the same, as we’ve highlighted above, unless both spouses pass away within a very short period of time from one another, higher taxes and Medicare premiums are likely inevitable. However, proper planning could help to dramatically reduce the impact this penalty could have on your plan.
Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP®, is a Partner and CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ professional at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Nick specializes in tax-efficient retirement income and distribution planning for clients and serves as a trusted source for local and national media publications, including WXYZ, PBS, CNBC, MSN Money, Financial Planning Magazine and OnWallStreet.com.
Securities offered through Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC. Center for Financial Planning, Inc is not a registered broker/dealer and is independent of Raymond James Financial Services Investment advisory services are offered through Center for Financial Planning, Inc. The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete, it is not a statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and it does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP®, RICP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James.
Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional.
These examples are hypothetical illustrations and are not intended to reflect any actual outcome. they are for illustrative purposes only. Individual cases will vary. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Prior to making any investment decision, you should consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.
Unless certain criteria are met, Roth IRA owners must be 59½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals are permitted. Additionally, each converted amount may be subject to its own five-year holding period. Converting a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA has tax implications. Investors should consult a tax advisor before deciding to do a conversion.
Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected, including diversification and asset allocation.
