Center Investing

Investment Performance - 1st Quarter 2013

invcom_performance_2013q1.jpg

Source: Morningstar

Bonds represented by Barclay's Aggregate Bond Index a market-weighted index of US bonds. US Large Companies per S&P 500 Index a market-cap weighted index of large company stocks. Barclay’s Global Bond index is a market-cap weighted index of global bonds. US Small Companies per Russell 2000 Index a market-cap weighted index of smaller company stocks. International stocks measured by MSCI EAFE is a stock market index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets outside of the US and Canada. Commodities per Morgan Stanley Commodity Index a broadly diversified index designed to track commodity futures contracts on physical commodities. Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield Index is an unmanaged index that covers the universe of fixed-rate, noninvestment-grade debt. Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield Index is an unmanaged indexthat covers the universe of fixed-rate, noninvestment-grade debt.

Inclusion of these indexes is for illustrative purposes only. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sequestration Frustration

invcom_20130225a.jpg
invcom_20130225b.jpg

After a debt-ceiling reprieve, the US government’s next big hurdle is the March 1st Sequester. What is sequestration and how does it affect you?

During the debt ceiling showdown in the summer of 2011, a group of arbitrary across-the-board spending cuts deemed unacceptable to both Democrats and Republicans was drafted to ensure action on deficit reduction. It wasn’t a solution, it was just a way to buy time and it’s called a sequester. Through a series of compromises, the deadline for the sequester has been moved to March 1, 2013 and separated from other components of the “fiscal cliff”.

When totaled, the sequester’s automatic spending cuts reduce government spending in 2013 by $85 billion (source: JP Morgan Market Bulletin, 2/19/13). Here’s a breakdown of cuts mapped out in the legislation through 2021.

invcom_20130225.jpg

What does the sequester mean to you as a citizen and investor?

Fiscal drag.The Congressional Budget Office estimates the initial impact to GDP in 2013 of around 0.56% if the sequester lasts from March through the end of the year (source: Washington Post, “The Sequester”, 2/20/2013).  This could mean uneasy stock markets, less hiring, and more muted recovery.

Arbitrary cuts. The punitive nature of across the board cuts may have an impact for you in other ways. Those most affected probably work within the government. Some could lose their jobs and those that don’t could find themselves working in a very constricted environment. For the average citizen,  daily encounters with the government may be slowed or changed. Some examples? Fewer food safety inspections, flight back-ups due to cuts at the FAA, slower federal court systems with lighter dockets meaning delays to cases, cuts to federally-funded scientific research, defense contracts, and reduced military benefits.

Market disruption.The idea of a sequester is popular with almost no one. This could translate into less confidence in stock markets and increased volatility. In the longer term, the failure to address debt and deficit issues could have even larger implications.

We can’t predict how everything relating to a spending sequester will fall out. Markets so far this year have turned the other cheek whether from fatigue with politically-inspired deadline drama or positive reaction to other news. We’ll keep you posted as Capitol Hill sorts things out in the coming weeks and months.

Required Disclaimer: The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Melissa Joy, CFP® and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.

Markets Welcome the New Year - 1st Quarter 2013

invcom_20130220a.jpg
invcom_20130220b.jpg

“Happy New Year!”  At least that’s what stock markets seem to be thinking. While 2012 posted solid returns across asset classes, 2013 has had a more exaggerated “off to the races” feeling for stocks. Money which was piled up on the sideline, whether from fear of the fiscal cliff or general concerns or fatigue, seems to be rushing back in to riskier investments like stocks.

Who hasn’t been happy in the new year? Government bond holders have a slight taste of potential negative returns as interest rates rose. The Barclay’s Capital Aggregate Bond Index returns fell by 0.70% through the end of January. Interest rates have risen in several small periods over the past year with some corresponding bond losses, but a clean slate of fresh “Year to Date” performance numbers may highlight these negatives more easily than hiccups buried within the year.

US GDP growth from the 4th quarter was markedly lower than expected falling by 0.1% as reported by the Commerce Department. What was ailing the US economy? Much of the blame goes to reduced spending, especially in the defense sector as there was anticipation of spending cuts related to the fiscal cliff. This is likely to be revised upward, though, because the trade deficit narrowed unexpectedly during the end of the year.

Washington’s grip on business page headlines is not done, but an agreement to avoid the so-called fiscal cliff as well as delay the debt ceiling limits seems to have been a welcome break from posturing and threats for a few weeks. We still have spending cuts to deal with in the next couple months so the respite may be short-lived. We are not fans of can kicking, but we also do not want government dysfunction to hijack the investment realm. We’ll keep you posted as developments unfold.

While growth has been muted, employment numbers continue to slowly look better as more people return to look for jobs and less new unemployment claims are registered. These numbers are an important factor in our economic picture today and while the US unemployment recovery is certainly sluggish, the direction of the numbers (more jobs, less unemployed) remains critical. In tandem with unemployment is housing which has been a major drag to the economy since 2008. Encouraging positive numbers have been reported from 2012 into 2013 for both housing prices and activity. This is a welcomed trend!

US economic reports aren’t the only positives. The notion of recovery is starting to be contemplated in Europe and while the Euro economies certainly aren’t out of the woods, the Euro itself seems more viable. In China, new leadership has also allayed fears of a hard landing in Asia. In the US, corporations continue to post strong earnings and a new reality in domestic energy production is starting to change some dynamics for US competitiveness.

January’s buying stampede cannot sustain itself for 12 months and we’re sure 2013 will have its investing ups and downs as does any other year. That said, those who continually forecast doom and gloom for US markets would be hard-pressed to explain the rising tide we’ve witnessed since the beginning of 2012.

Things are never as good or as bad as they may appear. Better returns may tip the investing scales from fear to greed. Don’t get too excited chasing returns of yesterday. We still recommend a prudent, diversified and consistent approach to investing as you strive to reach the finish line for each of your personal financial planning goals.

On behalf of everyone here at The Center,

Melissa Joy, CFP®

Partner, Director of Investments

Required Disclaimer: The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Melissa Joy, CFP® and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Investing involves risk and diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss. There is an inverse relationship between interest rate movements and bond prices. Generally, when interest rates rise, bond prices fall and when interest rates fall, bond prices generally rise. The Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index is a broad base index maintained by Barclays Capital and is often used to represent investment grade bonds being traded in United States. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investment Performance - 4th Quarter 2012

invcom_performance_2013q1.jpg

Source: Morningstar

Bonds represented by Barclay's Aggregate Bond Index a market-weighted index of US bonds. US Large Companies per S&P 500 Index a market-cap weighted index of large company stocks. Barclay’s Global Bond index is a market-cap weighted index of global bonds. US Small Companies per Russell 2000 Index a market-cap weighted index of smaller company stocks. International stocks measured by MSCI EAFE is a stock market index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets outside of the US and Canada. Commodities per Morgan Stanley Commodity Index a broadly diversified index designed to track commodity futures contracts on physical commodities. Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield Index is an unmanaged index that covers the universe of fixed-rate, noninvestment-grade debt. Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield Index is an unmanaged indexthat covers the universe of fixed-rate, noninvestment-grade debt.

Inclusion of these indexes is for illustrative purposes only. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fiscal Cliff Limbo

20121221a.jpg
20121221b.jpg

It’s December 21st as I write this which is the artificial deadline we circled for a fiscal cliff resolution in 2012. By the time that you read this we may have a resolution, but as of this writing we do not. Last night the House of Representatives abruptly adjourned without voting on Speaker of the House John Boehner’s “Plan B”.

No insider expected Plan B to be the ultimate resolution of the fiscal cliff debate. It was a bargaining chip for Speaker Boehner to show united resolve from House GOP during negotiations with President Obama. With that resolve now shattered, eyes turn toward an increased role of Senate Leaders: Republican Mitch McConnell and Democrat Harry Reid.

Without action between now and year-end, a bundle of tax increases and spending cuts will become effective January 1. It is important to keep in mind that this bundle of changes accumulates over a full calendar year to equal the billions of dollars that have been estimated to reduce the economy. While it looks like a compromise will be difficult in the next few days, any action in 2013 could be retroactive to the end of 2012, especially on the income tax front.

Greg Valliere, Chief Political Strategist at Potomac Research, has noted this week that we are now in a worst case scenario. This doesn’t mean the full “cliff” will necessarily be realized, but Washington may look to the markets for a “crisis” prior to acting. As of yesterday’s close, the US stock market as measured by the S&P 500 is trading above Election Day values. A pullback is not out of the question but recognize the fickle nature of political negotiations which make it very difficult to time peaks and valleys.

During this time, as always, we manage your portfolios with a steady hand recognizing that there are ebbs and flows in investing. You have stated goals for your investments related to your life needs. Our enduring purpose is to help you to achieve those goals through our investment and financial planning decisions. If you have any questions as we continue to navigate these choppy fiscal waters, please feel free to contact us.

On behalf of everyone at The Center,

Melissa Joy, CFP®

Partner, Director of Investments

Required Disclosure: The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material, are not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision, and do not constitute a recommendation. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Melissa Joy and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. The S&P 500is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that’s generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market.

Post-Election Investment Update: Cold Shoulder and the Fiscal Cliff

It’s been a year and almost $6 billion dollars since the kick-off of the presidential campaign cycle. After all that, we are left with relatively few changes in terms of the composition of the executive and legislative branches. President Barack Obama decisively won in the Electoral College race, but when all was said and done, he garnered less than a 3% advantage over Mitt Romney. In the election aftermath or afterglow, depending on your perspective, all eyes are now on the Fiscal Cliff and other looming issues that the president and Congress were unable to tackle in the last four years. Here are our thoughts on the impact of the election for the economy and your investments.

The Fiscal Cliff

There are wide-ranging tax increases and spending cuts set to occur after January 1st. These included mandatory spending cuts across the board, the end of the Bush-era tax cuts, Alternative Minimum Tax expansion and the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), investment income taxes, payroll tax holiday coming to an end, and more. All of this adds up to about $650 billion.

Some hoped for shifting control on Capitol Hill to address these issues, but this was not to be. With the same actors who could not resolve these issues for the last two years remaining in office, that seems to be wishful thinking. Some potential considerations:

  • Compromise possible: Some components of the Fiscal Cliff are not attractive to either party and government doesn’t have to figure out everything at once. Look for the possibility of compromises for things like AMT and mandatory spending cuts to occur prior to congressional recess in December.
  • Bush Tax Cuts: With much of the Republican House beholden to a “no tax increase” pledge, the expiration of Bush tax cuts as of the end of the year and then a roll-back of some of those increases for lower brackets is a threat favored by the most liberal wing of the Democratic Party. To us, this would be a disappointing result, but not out of the realm of possibility. Keep an eye on the discussion of what income level is left out. President Obama has said he wants tax increases for those making over $250,000. This is a starting point, but others have talked about levels upwards of $500,000 or $1,000,000.
  • Kicking the Can Down the Road:  It’s certainly possible that a compromise will not be reached or mapped out prior to year-end. In the past, this has resulted in an infuriating form of procrastination by agreeing to delay a decision until some date down the road. The more this occurs, the worse off we are. We are especially concerned if there is a delay today because of the impact on corporate decision-making which is thirsting for some clear guidance about the road ahead. Further, if the arbitrary date gets too close to mid-term elections, we’ll be left with even longer odds for an agreement. That said, if there is true desire from those involved to tackle more significant tax overhaul, buying more time may be critical. The last major tax policy shift occurred in 1986. President Reagan and a Democrat-controlled Congress took two years to put a deal together, and they were more agreeable counterparties.
  • Return of Volatility: Markets this year have had exceptionally low volatility when compared to recent years. Uncertainty and extreme possibilities will likely usher in very volatile returns through at least the end of the year and we’re already seeing this today. The more pain there is in the markets, the more likely that estranged parties become willing to work together for a solution. Do not be surprised if stock prices respond very positively and quickly if a compromise is reached.

Also on the Horizon

The Fiscal Cliff is not all that we should focus on as a result of the election. We are also watching:

  • Federal Reserve: A Romney win would have meant much more uncertainty as to the future leader of the Federal Reserve vs. President Obama’s continued allegiance to Chairman Ben Bernanke. While Bernanke has said that he does not want to stay for another term (which ends in 2014), it is likely that the low interest rate mandate will remain with a Bernanke-esque nominee. Possible reasons for a change to the current zero interest rate policy? Robust GDP growth or significant inflation which we think may be more likely the longer easy money sticks around.
  • Debt Ceiling: The current debt ceiling limit would be breached in early 2013 and coincides with the Fiscal Cliff discussions. Washington needs to remain on speaking terms to avoid the detriments of another failure to act on this issue.
  • Treasury Secretary: Timothy Geithner has said he is not interested in remaining at the Treasury. President Obama’s nomination for replacement will be very important in terms of cooperation with Congress as well as opportunities to tackle the long-term debt issues for the US. Watch to see if the nominee has a reputation of bipartisanship and dealing with Congress or a more ideological persona. While the Fiscal Cliff is in the spotlight today, we believe a long-term path to sustainable growth coupled with lower government debt is a much more critical issue.

We are encouraged by several factors that may lead to better resolutions to the serious issues that must be resolved by Washington powers today. A second-term president moves from a focus on reelection to the desire for a lasting legacy. In our estimation, nothing would be deemed more critical, both by Americans today and the history books, than creating a long-term plan for debt while leaving the economy in better shape than it is today. While Republicans, especially in the House of Representatives, spent the last two years working to deny President Obama reelection, they will need more constructive accomplishments on their resume as they look toward mid-term elections in two years. Finally, there seems to be stronger organized encouragement from the business community led by Fortune 500 CEO’s encouraging both sides to set aside their differences and to come to the table.

While markets have welcomed the election results with a cold shoulder, year-to-date returns remain positive for many investments. As stated earlier, we are not surprised by more disrupted markets post-election. Uncertainty breeds volatility and we expect weeks and possibly months of posturing before we have a more clear direction going forward.

I encourage you to follow the 80/20 rule when it comes to concerns with the market: spend 80% of your time focusing on financial decisions you can control and less than 20% of your time on external worry and fear. As always, we’re here to help. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or concerns.

On behalf of everyone at The Center,

Melissa Joy, CFP®
Partner, Director of Investments


The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Melissa Joy, CFP® and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users.

Investment Performance - 3rd Quarter 2012

invcom_performance_q4.jpg

Source: Morningstar

Bonds represented by Barclay's Aggregate Bond Index a market-weighted index of US bonds. US Large Companies per S&P 500 Index a market-cap weighted index of large company stocks. Barclay’s Global Bond index is a market-cap weighted index of global bonds. US Small Companies per Russell 2000 Index a market-cap weighted index of smaller company stocks. International stocks measured by MSCI EAFE is a stock market index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets outside of the US and Canada. Commodities per Morgan Stanley Commodity Index a broadly diversified index designed to track commodity futures contracts on physical commodities. Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield Index is an unmanaged index that covers the universe of fixed-rate, noninvestment-grade debt. Barclays Capital US Corporate High Yield Index is an unmanaged indexthat covers the universe of fixed-rate, noninvestment-grade debt.

Inclusion of these indexes is for illustrative purposes only. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investment Commentary - 3rd Quarter 2012

Stock returns as measured by the S&P 500 were in the hole for the quarter coming into June. They rallied somewhat for the month so that those invested accordingly had the potential to recover some.  This time of year also marks some of our most intense research activities including the Morningstar Investment Conference. I summed up our thoughts on portfolio positioning and the Eurozone in a special June update so I'd like to discuss some new trends and themes today.

A laundry list of news items are catching our attention today. They converge to create a growing tally of changes at the margin which may have investment implications for you.

  • We've sent you several communications about the changes to General Motors and Ford pensions. Even if you are not directly impacted, there may see similar changes if you have a defined benefit plan. Analysts believe that this is the start of a new wave of offloading pension obligations and that more announcements from other companies may follow. Our experiences show that the decisions to take a pension or lump-sum buyouts is largely personal and complex based upon your overall financial situation.

  • Around the world, interest rates have been falling as slowing growth in China and EuroCrisis have been answered by government intervention. This may be one of the reasons that the MSCI EAFE is flat on the year in spite of dire headlines overseas. While interest rates would be challenged to go lower in the US, there is some room for government intervention around the world, especially in emerging markets -- think of Brazil as an example.
  • A surprising slowdown in overall US debt growth has been occurring under our nose. No, the US federal debt load keeps growing, but there has been measurable deleveraging on the state and household levels. Some of this has come through the painful process of personal bankruptcy and foreclosures. States and municipalities have been practicing their own austerity with layoffs and less borrowing.

  • The Affordable Care Act was largely upheld by the Supreme Court last month. This will have implications for Americans of all walks of life. For some of you some of the implications will be investment-related due to the 3.8% surtax on investment income in higher earnings brackets. This increase on investment income may not be the end given the pending expiration of "Bush" tax cuts. The coordination between tax strategy and investment management will become more and more critical in coming years.
  • Scandalous headlines resurfaced at big banks, most recently JP Morgan and Barclays. JPM disclosed that it had major losses due to poor risk controls in exotic trades. The Barclay's LIBOR scandal is in its early days and may be much larger than it appears on the surface. Essentially, Barclay's has admitted that it fudged reports of borrowing costs over the last five years. Many Americans may have been negatively impacted since adjustable loans linked to LIBOR are widespread for mortgages, student loans, and car loans.

    We live in a heavily regulated financial world. I know this as much as anyone as each of these messages to you is reviewed in-depth by a compliance department prior to publishing. If I had my druthers, my day would involve less red tape and easier direct communication with you. The continued misbehavior of corporations and individuals alike seems to justify at least some of this burdensome regulation.

As the election season heats up, Angie Palacios, CFP®, Portfolio Coordinator, has focused her MoneyCentered blog posts on politics and investing. Click here to read the series.

Speaking of politics, I recently heard Columbia University Professor of History Eric Foner in an interview discussing Abraham Lincoln's presidency and leadership strengths. He mentioned that one of Lincoln’s strongest character traits was the ability to change his mind on critical issues. “Lincoln was a flip-flopper, if you want to use the terminology of modern politics.” While a politician today is accused of something close to political treason each time they tweak or change their mind, I value the ability to keep an open mind as an investor.

We think long and hard about what would be best for you as our clients and what worked yesterday may not always work tomorrow. We take the changing investment landscape into consideration as we make investment decisions while we will stick with our process which encourages us to analyze and evaluate risks and opportunities for you. Perhaps if our elected officials were afforded the same flexibility there would be more compromise and less frustration with our nation’s capital. 

I always enjoy hearing from those of you who are reading these investment updates. Don't hesitate to let me know if you have any questions, comments, or suggestions for future topics.

On behalf of everyone here at The Center,

Melissa Joy, CFP®
Partner, Director of Investments
Investment Advisor Representative, RJFS


The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Melissa Joy, CFP® and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users.

June 2012 Investment Performance - 2nd Quarter 2012

invcom_201207_1.jpg

Source: Morningstar

Bonds represented by Barclay's Aggregate Bond Index a market-weighted index of US bonds. US Large Companies per S&P 500 Index a market-cap weighted index of large company stocks. Barclay’s Global Bond index is a market-cap weighted index of global bonds. US Small Companies per Russell 2000 Index a market-cap weighted index of smaller company stocks. International stocks measured by MSCI EAFE is a stock market index designed to measure the equity market performance of developed markets outside of the US and Canada. Commodities per Morgan Stanley Commodity Index a broadly diversified index designed to track commodity futures contracts on physical commodities. 

Inclusion of these indexes is for illustrative purposes only. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

A Debt Surprise - 3rd Quarter 2012

It seems as though we American’s should be giving ourselves a pat on the back.  Ever since the financial crisis we have shown a noticeable improvement in our debt levels as a percent of gross disposable income.  About half of the excess debt (amount above the trend line or average growth in ratio of debt to disposable income) built up since the year 2000 has been eliminated.  The growth in debt over the past ten years sprang from the availability of home equity loans and most of this availability has dried up since the decrease in property values. 

invcom_201207_3.jpg

Unfortunately our government can’t say the same yet.  While government debt is leveling off and slowly drifting downward looking at forward estimates, our politicians have a lot of work to do over the next decade or so tightening their belts.

invcom_201207_2.png

It is quite common for households and corporations to lead the way in debt reduction during an economic recovery.  After all, it is far easier for us to reduce our spending (even though it may not feel like it!) since we don’t have to worry about winning the next election.  Also, governments delay their debt reduction in order to attempt to stimulate the economy by spending more so individuals and households can have healthier balance sheets.  Later the government can work to reduce their own debt. 

When looking under the hood we may not have as much to be proud of as we thought.  Sadly, much of the consumer debt reduction has come in the form of foreclosure and defaults.  Coming out the other side of this, consumers will have either less or more expensive credit available to them (partially due to lower credit scores and also due to no home equity to borrow upon) and thus won’t be able to fuel the economy quite so much as the government has come to expect in the last decade. 

Reduced consumer spending could make the government’s job much more difficult reducing their own debt.  The U.S. government is highly unlikely to default on their debt like consumers did so they would need to depend on GDP growth (among other factors like Inflation) to shrink overall debt levels.  And with consumers not spending as much it is unclear where this rebound in GDP will come from.

It seems logical to say “Enough is enough!” and make the hard cuts necessary to win this battle over debt in the coming years.  However, nothing is ever that simple when it comes to deciding what programs to actually cut and how that may affect other aspects of the meager economic recovery.

The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios, CFP® and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James.