Medicare Costs and Social Security

In a previous post I shared that the Social Security Administration recently announced a Cost of Living Adjustment for 2012 in the amount of 3.6%. Those covered by Medicare will be interested in knowing that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) also announced that Medicare Part B premiums in 2012 will be $15.50 per month LESS than in 2011 ($99.90 in 2012). However, many folks (estimated at 75%) have been paying $96.40 since 2008, so this is really an increase of $3.50/month more for most. 

So, assuming this is an increase for most can it be good news?  I think so.  (Easy for me to say,  I know - I am not a recipient). Even assuming a $3.50 increase seems like good news with the extreme northward direction of medical costs in general over the past few years. Many had feared that Medicare premiums were going to escalate at a rate that would essentially offset the expected average Social Security increase of $43 completely. 

Further good news includes estimates by the CMS that the average Medicare Part D prescription drug plan premium will be near $30 and Medicare Advantage premiums will be lower for 2012. 

Additional information regarding the Medicare announcements can be found at: www.cms.gov 

Have a Social Security or Medicare question?  Send me an email – the tougher the question the better.  And remember, there’s no such thing as a dumb question when dealing with government agency’s policies (or the tax code).

The Key to Planning for Your Lifestyle in Retirement

After working with retirement clients for nearly 30 years, I have learned many things.  One of the most important lessons I have learned is that we all need to have the answer to one very simple question before we begin the planning process -- “what does it cost for me to live per month”?   As planners we can develop scenarios to help achieve retirement goals, but if we start with the wrong premise, we may be forming strategies to meet the wrong goal. 

Why is it so difficult to come up with a figure for our income needs? The general tendency is to underestimate expenditures and overestimate income. We also think about what we should be spending, not what we do spend.  Not knowing our expenditures comes about because we forget a few things:

  • Food, shelter, transportation and clothing are only the beginning of expenses. They are the ones we see each month.
  • We need to add insurances, taxes, gifts, car replacements, vacations, travel, family visits, and hobby and entertainment expenses. 
  • If you have children, your educational expenses may drop off by the time you retire but you need to determine how much you might need for weddings and launching (yes—getting your darlings out of the parental home)
  • If you plan to change your living arrangements, you need to factor in not only the additional cost of making a change but also the change in monthly expenditures related to the move.

There are circumstances that are out of our control, such as the rising cost of health care and insurance, declining markets and inflation.  To guard against these events we need to factor in percentage increases over time and to have a savings cushion of at least six months to help us weather the storm.

When I have gone through this analysis with clients, I often find a dramatic difference between projected income needs and actual income needs.  Can you imagine trying to reach your destination with only half a tank of gas?  It doesn’t work. Using the wrong expenditure figure can ruin the lifestyle you anticipated.

Talk to your financial advisor about tools to help you track your monthly income needs.

 

Laurie Renchik Supports “Women of Words” Fundraising Event

Michigan Women’s Media recently hosted a “Women of Words” fundraiser to kick-start its annual Women and Journalism Internship.  Three Michigan authors headlined the evening by talking about their work and passion for writing. 

The historic Masonic Hall in downtown Farmington provided a wonderful venue for the event.  Guests enjoyed tea service, petit sandwiches and a cupcake dessert bar.  The Center for Financial Planning proudly sponsored the event.

Laurie serves as an active board member for Michigan Women’s Media, Inc. where she joins an equally dedicated group of women supporting this newly formed non-profit organization.  Their primary mission is to fund and maintain a robust internship program that will offer student journalists the opportunity to write about women’s interests.

Contact Laurie for additional information or volunteer opportunities.

What Does a Social Security Raise Mean to You?

You may have heard that the Social Security Administration recently announced a 3.6% cost of living increase for Social Security recipients starting in 2012. This is good news for those receiving Social Security benefits, as the last increase came two years ago (5.8% in 2009).  If you are not yet drawing Social Security, you may be wondering what this raise means for you. 

While a PhD in Social Security benefits might be needed to calculate how, a fact that is less known is that those aged 62 or older who are not receiving benefits just yet also receive benefit of the 3.6% increase.  Essentially, Social Security benefits before age 60 are based on wage increases, but at age 62 they are based on price increases, i.e. the 3.6% cost of living adjustment. 

Other Social Security related changes courtesy of Horsesmouth.com include:

  • The maximum taxable wage base rises to $110,100 in 2012, up from $106,800 in 2011.  This means that you do not pay Social Security tax on any wages over $110,100 next year.
  • The earnings test before full retirement age rises to $14,640 in 2012, up from $14,160 in 2011.  If you are drawing Social Security before your full retirement age, you can earn $14,640 next year before your Social Security benefits will be reduced.
  • The maximum Social Security benefit for a maximum earner retiring in 2012 will be $2,513/month, up from 2,366/month in 2011.

The bottom line is that Social Security benefits can have a meaningful impact during retirement and it is important to maximize those benefits to the extent possible.  Careful analysis based on your particular situation is therefore critical to your financial health.  Consult your financial advisor about maximizing your Social Security benefits.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete.

The Gift that Keeps on Giving

As the holiday shopping season approaches, many of us struggle to make our gift lists.  This can be a frustrating exercise, particularly when it comes to you adult children and grandchildren.  What can we possibly give them that will be appreciated and not be sitting on the dresser in a week when the next new gadget comes along?  Why not consider a gift that will keep on giving long after your gone?

If your children or grandchild had earned income from employment during 2011, you can contribute up to $5,000 or 100% of their total earnings (whichever is less) in a ROTH IRA in the child’s name.  [Remember that what you put in to the ROTH IRA counts toward the $13,000 annual gift exclusion; $26k if your spouse contributes to the gift].

Why is the ROTH IRA such a great gift?

  • It grows tax-free over time.  A $5k contribution to a 16 year-old’s ROTH IRA earning 8% each year will grow to $217,000 by age 65*.  If the child works summers during high school and college and contributes each year, the future balance in the account will likely be significantly larger.
  • ROTH IRAs provide tax-free withdrawals after age 59 ½**.
  • In some specific situations, the child can pull out contributions (not earnings) free of tax (i.e. for the purchase of a first home).

A Roth IRA can be one of the best gifts you can give…one that will be giving for years to come.

 

*This is a hypothetical illustration and is not intended to reflect the actual performance of any particular security.  Future performance cannot be guaranteed and investment yields will fluctuate with market conditions.

**Unless certain criteria are met, ROTH IRA owners must be 59 ½ or older and have held the IRA for five years before tax-free withdrawals are permitted.

 

Laurie Renchik Embarks on Leadership Oakland Cornerstone Program

Since 1990, the Leadership Oakland Cornerstone Program has brought together over 900 leaders from corporate, civic and non-profit organizations.

As one of class of 50 leaders for 2011-12, Laurie’s membership in this program provides exposure to an exclusive organization with a mission to develop leadership skills, expose individuals to key issues impacting the region, and enable participants to reach their full potential personally, professionally, and through public service to their communities.

Laurie recently attended the Kick-Off Retreat, a three-day, two-night retreat, where participants were provided an overview of the region and its challenges, insights into their own leadership style, and an opportunity to get to know their fellow Leadership Oakland classmates.  They will also set goals for their year in the Leadership Oakland Cornerstone program.

Laurie commented, "Over time community leaders armed with knowledge, collective creativity and innovation can change the course of our region to a stronger more vibrant future.”

By building a shared understanding and partnership, Cornerstone graduates develop purpose and commitment to the community for the organizations they represent and the communities they live and work in.

Taking IRA Distributions Before You Need Them?

My wife truly enjoys talking to our two dogs – not that she expects them to talk back (I don’t think so at least) – but who doesn’t enjoy seeing their heads turn as if that will really help them understand what she has to say.  I had a client give me a similar look a few years back when I suggested taking money from his IRA even though he didn’t need it for current spending.  (The client was past age 59.5 but younger than age 70.5 so he didn’t have to take a distribution quite yet.) 

While, like my dogs, he didn’t say anything his look suggested that he was thinking “why would I take a distribution that I don’t need and accelerate income taxes?”  His head started to turn straight again when I illustrated that he might want to maximize the lower tax brackets.  A married couple filing jointly can have taxable income up to $69,000 in 2011 and still remain in the 15% marginal income tax bracket (remember taxable income is adjusted gross income minus exemptions and deductions). For this client, they could take out roughly $25,000 from their IRA and still be within the 15% marginal bracket.  While no one knows what income tax rates will be for sure in the future –locking in a 15% rate seemed attractive. 

2011 IRS Tax Brackets

To find out if accelerating IRA distributions is the right move for you, work with your financial planner and tax preparer to run “what if” scenarios.

Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Timothy W. Wyman, CFP®, JD, and Center for Financial Planning, Inc., and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Please note, changes in tax laws or regulations may occur at any time and could substantially impact your situation. While we are familiar with the tax provisions of the issues presented herein, as Financial Advisors of RJFS we are not qualified to render advice on tax or legal matters.

 

Building Your Foundation

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP® Angela Palacios

Asset allocation is like the foundation of your house. It is the most important structural part of your investment process. Without it, your home or your financial plans could become extremely unstable. 

Many investors either become paralyzed and unable to make decisions, or make decisions by constantly chasing the recent past and, thus, earning dismal returns.  To avoid those mistakes, one of the first and most important steps in investing is determining your Asset Allocation. 

An Asset Allocation Model is usually the outcome of the financial plan you complete with your investment professional. Its goals are normally to identify the mix of assets that best balances an investor’s desire for return with the desire not to take undue risk.  Studies have shown that asset allocation decisions account for a significant amount of the variation of total returns, while security selection accounts for a relatively small portion of the variability of total returns.  The most notable study was done in 1986 by Brinson, Hood and Beebower.  The researchers found that the asset allocation policy explained 93.6% of the average funds’ variation over time. 

In its simplest form, Asset Allocation is the percent of stocks, bonds, and cash you would own in a world of normal valuations.  Generally, allocations with more stocks than bonds would be in the “High Risk/High Return” area of the line on the “Efficient Frontier” chart below.

Efficient Frontier_1_Asset Allocation Post.jpg

Disclosure:  The “Efficient Frontier” is a concept derived from Modern Portfolio Theory.  According to the theory, it is possible to construct an “efficient frontier” of optimal portfolios offering the maximum possible expected return for a given level of risk.

This chart can change greatly depending on the time period you use to draw it.  The following is how the above chart varies in actuality decade to decade.

© Dorsey Wright & Associates

© Dorsey Wright & Associates

In the 1960s, 1980s and 1990s stocks significantly outperformed bonds. While the 1970s and the 2000s show a much different story. Not only were stocks an underperforming asset, but the risks involved were very high using standard deviation as our risk scale. (The Weiss Report, Vol. 13)

While careful Asset Allocation can help make your investment portfolio structurally strong, unlike the foundation of your house, shifting investments can be a good thing. In practicality your Asset Allocation, rather than being static, can be changed tactically to reflect current market conditions as shown above.  Watch future posts to find out more about using asset allocation and other investment strategies. 

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.


Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Center for Financial Planning, Inc., and not necessarily those of RJFS or Raymond James. Every investor’s situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Asset allocation does not ensure a profit or protect against a loss.