Center Team Members Participate in Money Smart Week

Contributed by: Center for Financial Planning, Inc. The Center

April is Financial Literacy Month and when it comes to financial literacy, knowing how to manage your money is a big part. That’s why the “Money Smart Week” public awareness campaign was created by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago in 2002. This year it falls on April 18 – 25th. The goal is to help consumers better manage their personal finances. This is achieved through the collaboration and coordinated effort of hundreds of organizations across the country, including local organizations like our Financial Planning Association of Michigan. Other involved include local libraries and corporations that are dedicated to promoting financial literacy (like the Center for Financial Planning!).

Programming is offered to all demographics and income levels and covers all facets of personal finance. Melissa Joy, CFP® and Sandy Adams, CFP® are again volunteering at their local libraries where they will be offering presentations to the public on financial planning topics. To find an event to attend in your neighborhood, click here: Money Smart Week®.


Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members.

Part 4 – A Year of Lessons on Money Matters for your Children & Grandchildren

Contributed by: Matthew E. Chope, CFP® Matt Chope

Try it all and be prepared to make some mistakes.

That’s a good reminder to everyone, no matter the generation. But when it comes to passing on lessons about money matters to your kids or grandkids, I say try to keep those mistakes small and learn from them. Many of us like to have firsthand experience (I know I do) rather than just taking someone’s word for it. But if I could offer advice from my own experience, here’s what I’d say:

Start with Diversification

In my opinion, diversification is probably the number one most important rule in investing.  It will not make you rich but it can help keep you from going poor. You want to diversify your experiences greatly in your 20s because it’s easy to invest a lot of time and energy in one area and end up not liking where you get to.  Imagine climbing a ladder for 5-10 years only to find that it was leaning against the wrong wall! Use this time in life to literally and figuratively invest your time and money in anything that you’re curious about. Try things that make you uncomfortable.

Along the meandering path, realize you are going through this learning curve.  Try to take it all in. Notice your senses, your happiness and fulfillment relating to the different activities you invest in.  Most people get to the last quarter of their life seeking greater fulfillment and happiness from their life.  They never paid attention during the first quarter to the path they were on or the wall they were climbing. 

Along your journey consider that data is not information and information is not knowledge and knowledge is not experience and experience is not wisdom (as you’ll see in the diagram below).  Reflect on where you might be in each investment.

Digging Through the Data to Make Decisions

To take this idea a little deeper, we are continually inundated with data; the internet, TV, radio, people -- some with facts and some with opinions.  A key to financial success for many is being able to distinguishing useful data and information from nonsense. Knowing how to gather a collection of measured data that can be extrapolated into information is the cornerstone of constructive decision-making. 

Knowledge requires thoughtful discernment of information, combined with known truths founded on logic based proofs.  Notice I went far with math from the last statement.  So this is how my thoughts are structured and it works for me.  There may be other ways to get to constructive decision making also, but I believe this will determine a great deal of your financial success in life.  

Facts can strengthen beliefs to formulate knowledge, but this is where you will find disagreement.  My experience has been that a combination of well-formulated beliefs with accepted knowledge provides a basis for openness and understanding.

Throughout the coming years you will go through interpretations of knowledge gaining first-hand experience as events almost seem to repeat.  These experiences might not be exact but understanding the patterns over decades can eventually lead to wisdom.

Matthew E. Chope, CFP ® is a Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Matt has been quoted in various investment professional newspapers and magazines. He is active in the community and his profession and helps local corporations and nonprofits in the areas of strategic planning and money and business management decisions. In 2012 and 2013, Matt was named to the Five Star Wealth Managers list in Detroit Hour magazine.


Five Star Award is based on advisor being credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR), a FINRA registered representative, a CPA or a licensed attorney, including education and professional designations, actively employed in the industry for five years, favorable regulatory and complaint history review, fulfillment of firm review based on internal firm standards, accepting new clients, one- and five-year client retention rates, non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered, number of client households served.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Matthew Chope, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss.

Slightly Off-Center: What is the one thing you cannot do without?

Contributed by: Center for Financial Planning, Inc. The Center

There’s a lot you know about our team at The Center … but we’ve dug up answers to some questions you might have never thought to ask.

My water bottle – take that thing everywhere –Jennifer Hackmann

Coffee/Caffeine –Matt Trujillo

Iced Tea –Melissa Joy

The gym or working out – I’m not an exercise fanatic by any means but I have to be active at least a few times a week or I just don’t feel like myself –Nick Defenthaler

Three Reasons to Consider a Family Caregiver Contract

Contributed by: Sandra Adams, CFP® Sandy Adams

Many family members are drawn into caregiving out of love. Most times, it is the female child that is pulled into the role of caregiver as a parent ages and has increasing needs. The statistics are overwhelming…

  • 66 million people in the U.S. provide unpaid care to a relative or friend.*

  • 70% of caregivers report making adjustments to work schedules, or quit work altogether, to accommodate caregiving responsibilities.  Caregivers may reduce their hours at work or forfeit promotions and benefits.**

  • A 2011 study showed that caregivers lost $303,880 in wages, Social Security benefits, and private pensions over their lifetime as a result of caregiving responsibilities.**

It is important to understand that caregiving and care needs can have serious consequences for the entire family, and that careful planning is important to ensure financial stability for all parties involved. 

When to Officially Hire a Family Member

In many cases, skilled care is needed, and that care needs to be provided by trained and licensed medical professionals.  However, there are other needs (i.e. transportation, housekeeping, etc.) that can be provided by a family member.  In these cases, you can consider officially hiring a family member under a paid family caregiver contract.  A family caregiver contract is a legal employment contract that defines the care and compensation expectations between the aging parent and the family member providing the care.  Here are three reasons for a family to consider using a family caregiver contract:

  1. The family member providing the care (the caregiver) can be receiving financial compensation for providing care, especially when they may have had to reduce or give up entirely their paid employment. The caregiver is provided a chance for continued financial stability.

  2. It can help avoid misunderstandings and bad feelings with other family members about who is providing care and how much money is changing hands.  The agreement can be very specific and can be tied to the aging parent’s overall estate planning.

  3. If the aging parent ever needs to enter a nursing home or needs Medicaid to pay for long term care needs, the agreement can show that payments for the care to the family member were legitimate and were not made in an attempt to “hide” or “gift” funds in order to qualify for Medicaid.

When it comes to planning for aging parents and coordinating the caregiving roles amongst family members, things can get complicated very quickly.  It often comes down to the one who is nearest, not who has the time or the money, that becomes the caregiver.  Making things fair and giving your parent and the sibling(s) who provide care the best chance for financial stability along the way is the best course of action.  Work with your financial planner and a team of experts to come up with a plan for your family that may include an elder law attorney to consider tools like a family caregiver contract.

Sandra Adams, CFP® is a Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Sandy specializes in Elder Care Financial Planning and is a frequent speaker on related topics. In 2012-2014 Sandy has been named to the Five Star Wealth Managers list in Detroit Hour magazine. In addition to her frequent contributions to Money Centered, she is regularly quoted in national media publications such as The Wall Street Journal, Research Magazine and Journal of Financial Planning.


Five Star Award is based on advisor being credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR), a FINRA registered representative, a CPA or a licensed attorney, including education and professional designations, actively employed in the industry for five years, favorable regulatory and complaint history review, fulfillment of firm review based on internal firm standards, accepting new clients, one- and five-year client retention rates, non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered, number of client households served.

*National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP. Caregiving in the U.S., 2009.

**The MetLife Mature Market Institute, MetLife Study of Caregiving Costs to Working Caregivers, June 2011.

The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Sandra Adams and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Raymond James and its advisors do not offer tax or legal advice. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members.

4 Reasons Putnam Investments is back in the Winner’s Circle

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson Jaclyn Jackson

During the first quarter of 2015, I had the pleasure of attending Putnam Investment’s Research Analyst Meeting.  Even though a giant snowstorm hit the area just days before, positive energy seemed to be bursting at the seams in Boston. Admittedly, the Patriots had just won the Super Bowl and the victory parade was the day before the conference started, but the positive feeling at Putnam Investments came from something else.  It came from a proud shift in company culture that helped propel the firm back into its rightful spot in the winner’s circle of investment companies.

Putnam’s Fall & Rise

Having had their reputation shattered in 2003 after Securities and Exchange Commission market timing and late trading investigation, Putnam’s net asset level plummeted dramatically through 2008.  Fighting to stop the bleeding, Putnam decided to completely revamp.  On the first day of the conference, I had a chance to listen to R. Jeffrey Orr (President and CEO of Power Financial Corporation) and Robert Reynolds (President and CEO of Putnam) discuss how they turned the company’s culture on its head.  I remember R. Jeffrey Orr saying that when he first came to Putnam, there was a “playing not to lose” attitude and his goal became to shift that to a “playing to win” attitude. 

The Changing Culture at Putnam

I was most impressed by the analysts’ panel.  In line with the changes Orr and Reynolds set out to accomplish, the analysts talked about how Putnam’s research culture evolved to become more entrepreneurial and team based.  These fundamental changes have improved fund performance and subsequently brought Putnam back to life.  Many factors helped make that change happen, but here are what I see as the top four reasons Putnam is back in the winner’s circle:

  1. Shared Research: In the old company culture, credit analysts and equity analysts never crossed the aisle to work with each other.  Now, it is common for credit and equity analysts to combine research (as credit research often captures a perspective that differs from equity research performed on the same company and vice versa) to make better assessments of a company.
  2. Personal Accountability: Each analyst constructs his/her own individual portfolio and is rewarded based on how well his/her portfolio performs.  In this way, analysts are acknowledged for all the good calls they make and not just the calls they make that the portfolio manager adapts to the fund portfolio.  This encourages good ideas, individual thinking, high conviction, and entrepreneurship. 
  3. Different Compensation Structure: Putnam’s compensation structure differs from other companies in that, typically, analysts fight over a lump sum amount intended to be split among them. The traditional structure often pits researchers against each other; even if more than one person has a good year, only the best researcher is compensated.  Putnam’s structure allows everyone to be compensated for the choices they make in their individual portfolios; essentially, everyone can be rewarded when they make positive attributions.  Culturally, the compensation structure helps thought sharing and helps build comradery (provided analysts are no longer motivated to hoard good ideas).
  4. Efficient Communication: Communication has improved between portfolio managers, analysts, and traders.  To start, everyone is centrally located - meaning you can physically see when someone is at their desk and consult with them as needed.  This informal meeting style has helped Putnam eradicate the long, formal meetings they once had.  Check-ins are shorter, but more frequent and have generated more time for everyone to fulfill their job responsibilities.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Links are being provided for information purposes only. Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse, authorize or sponsor any of the listed websites or their respective sponsors. Raymond James is not responsible for the content of any website or the collection or use of information regarding any website's users and/or members.

Can You Roll Your 401(k) to an IRA without Leaving Your Job?

Typically, when you hear “rollover” you think retirement or changing jobs.  For the vast majority of clients, these two situations will really be the only time they will complete a 401k rollover.  However, you might not know about another type of situation in which you can move funds from your company retirement plan to your IRA.  This is what’s known as the “in-service” rollover and is an often overlooked planning opportunity. 

Rollover Refresher

A rollover is a pretty simple concept.  It is the process of moving your employer retirement account (401k, 403b, 457, etc.) over to an IRA that you have complete control over and is completely separate from your ex-employer.  Most people do this when they retire or switch jobs.  If completed properly, rolling over funds from your company retirement plan to your IRA is a tax and penalty free transaction because the tax characteristics of a 401k and IRA are generally the same.   

What is an “in-service” rollover?

Unlike the “traditional” rollover, an “in-service” rollover is probably something you’ve never heard of and for good reason.  First, not all company retirement plans allow for it, and second, even for those that do, the details can be confusing to employees.  The bottom line: An in-service rollover allows an employee (often at a specified age such as 55) to be able to roll their 401k to an IRA while still employed with the company.  The employee is also still able to contribute to the plan, even after the rollover is complete.  Most plans allow this type of rollover once per year, but depending on the plan, you could potentially complete the rollover more often for different contribution types.

Why complete an “in-service” rollover?

More investment options – With any company retirement plan, you will be limited to the investment options the plan offers.  By having the funds in an IRA, you can invest in just about any mutual fund, ETF, stock, bond, etc.  Having access to more options can potentially improve investment performance, reduce volatility and make your overall portfolio allocation more efficient.

Coordination with your other assets – If you’re working with a financial planner, he or she can coordinate an IRA into your overall plan far more efficiently than a 401k.  How many times has your planner recommended changes in your 401k that simply don’t get completed? (Tisk, tisk!)  If your planner is managing the IRA for you, those recommended changes are going to get completed instead of falling off your personal “to-do” list.     

Additional flexibility – IRAs allow certain penalty-free withdrawals that aren’t available in a 401k or other company retirement plans (certain medical expenses, higher education expenses, first time homebuyer allowance, etc.).  Although using an IRA for these expenses should be a last resort, it’s nice to have the flexibility if needed.

Exploring “in-service” rollovers

So what now?  The first thing is to always keep your financial planner in the loop when you retire or switch jobs to see if a rollover makes sense for your situation.  Second, let’s work together to see if your current company retirement plans allows for an in-service rollover.  It’s typically a 5 minute phone call with us, you and your HR department to find out.  With so many things going on in life, an in-service rollover is probably pretty close to the bottom of your priority list.  This is why you have us on your financial team. We bring these opportunities to your attention and work with you to see if they could benefit your situation! 

Nick Defenthaler, CFP® is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Nick is a member of The Center’s financial planning department and also works closely with Center clients. In addition, Nick is a frequent contributor to the firm’s Money Centered and Center Connections blogs.

Matthew Trujillo, CFP®, is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Matt currently assists Center planners and clients, and is a contributor to Money Centered.


This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Nick Defenthaler, CFP® & Matt Trujillo, CFP®, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. IRA withdrawals may be subject to income taxes, and prior to age 59 1/2 a 10% federal penalty tax may apply. In-Service Rollovers mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Be sure to contact a qualified professional regarding your particular situation before electing an In-Service Rollover. You should discuss any tax or legal matters with the appropriate professional. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss.

Slightly Off-Center: Most famous person you’ve met?

Contributed by: Center for Financial Planning, Inc. The Center

There’s a lot you know about our team at The Center … but we’ve dug up answers to some questions you might have never thought to ask.

Danny Devito –Jennifer Hackmann

Oprah Winfrey –Matt Trujillo

Tim Allen (before he was famous though) –Nancy Sechrist

Unfortunately, I haven’t had the pleasure of meeting anyone incredibly famous but I have met Gordie Howe a few times and being such a big hockey fan, that was pretty cool to me –Nick Defenthaler

Most famous person you met? I met George W. Bush recently.  Regardless of political perspective, it was a pleasure and honor to meet a former US President –Tim Wyman

Are we Seeing Inflation or Deflation in the US Economy?

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson Jaclyn Jackson

The Fed has created investor concern by stumbling away from its hope of 2% inflation.  That concern has given rise to a polarizing inflation/deflation debate. With a fragile recovery at stake, the Fed struggles against overcoming persistently low inflation rates and losing the public’s faith.  At the same time, investors build their cases for inflation or deflation; each side posing strong arguments for why either threatens the US economy.   

Evidence of Deflation

Investors who find themselves in the deflation camp argue that fears that the European Central Bank’s bond buying program will make the euro less attractive and send investors flocking to rising currencies.  As a result, European growth will improve, but at the expense of growth in the US, Switzerland, and other countries with strong currencies.

Moreover, January 2015 marked the third month in a row that prices for goods declined, clearly discouraging hope of a healthy growing US economy.  With a -0.1% price decline in January, goods actually cost less than they did one year ago. Similar to 2009, deflation affects falling prices, consumer spending, and adds pressure to corporate profit margins, typically spawning wage reductions and increased unemployment.

Not to mention, some dispute whether quantitative easing even worked.  The Fed made huge bond purchases with the intention of increasing the money supply.  Ideally, central bank asset purchases should increase bank reserves and the money supply, resulting in increased lending by banks. However, in reality, banks were so panicked during the financial crisis that they held on to the excess money and did not lend. There can’t be inflation without lending.

Argument for Inflation

Conversely, investors in the inflation camp argue that the energy sector, especially cheap gas prices, is the primary driver of falling goods prices.  Moreover, they believe recent price stabilizing marks the beginning of increasing gas prices moving forward. Essentially, as gas prices rebound, the inflation figures should also put deflation worries to bed.

What’s more, if you exclude energy from consumer prices, staples such as food, shelter, and medical care have increased 1.9% from 2014.  When the most volatile categories like food and fuel are removed from the equation, core inflation is steady and up 1.6% from last January.  These numbers reflect the economy being more in line with the Fed’s 2% goal.

Despite looming worries, economists are still optimistic about the overall improvement of the US economy.  Many credit quantitative easing for keeping interest rates low, building job creation opportunities, and preventing the Great Recession from becoming the second Great Depression. However, it is also important to note that critics of quantitative easing say that a long-term effect could be high inflation.

The Verdict

This is not a black and white issue.  There are areas of inflation and deflation pulling the US economy in both directions.  We are watching bank stability, consumer spending, and credit to monitor the situation.  Yet, taking the glass half full perspective, investors can be comforted that the United States’ core inflation is key in differentiating the U.S. economy from more challenging economies like Japan and the Eurozone. 


This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson, Investment Research Associate and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson, Investment Research Associate and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss.

Possibilities Conference Offers Insights on Aging

Contributed by: Melissa Parkins Melissa Parkins

I recently attended the Branch Possibilities Conference at the Raymond James home office in St. Petersburg, Florida. The theme this year was "Working with Aging Clients". I had high hopes of receiving quality information that I could bring back to our office, like many others have been able to do in past years. My time there exceeded my expectations. Not only did I have a great time away from the office (and in some warm and humid weather!), I met a lot of interesting and intelligent people, got to collaborate with other RJ associates and learned more than I expected to about opportunities at Raymond James, including new technology, that we hope to share with clients in coming months.

My top takeaways:

  • I heard a lot about the work RJ has been doing regarding future quality of life. Their research was used by many different presenters at the conference. One of the main themes revisited throughout the entire conference was the three questions that can be used to predict future quality of life: Who will change my light bulbs? How will I get an ice cream cone? Who will I have lunch with? For more on how the answers to these questions can provide valuable insight on housing and quality of life issues, take a look at this blog by Sandy Adams, CFP®. These are three simple and innovative questions that clients, families and planners should be discussing to assess preparedness for long life in retirement.
  • The value of debt, especially for an aging client, was another hot topic. I learned of the new lending options available for all clients based on securities through Raymond James bank (lines of credit, mortgages, etc.).  These new lending opportunities open up planning options for clients of all ages that weren’t present in the past.  We look forward to conversations with clients about these opportunities during meetings in the coming months.
  • Social Security continues to be a hot topic as it relates to retirement income strategies.  We talk a lot about this with clients as they prepare for retirement.  The presentations at the conference connected a lot of dots for me personally, and we look forward to continuing to put Social Security strategies to work for our clients in the context of their lifelong retirement income planning.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Melissa Parkins, Registered Client Service Associate and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete.

Is a Market Correction Coming Soon?

Contributed by: Matthew E. Chope, CFP® Matt Chope

I’ve said before that I believe market corrections are as natural as the day is long. That’s why, in my last blog, I shared 3 steps to prepare for market volatility. But how do you know if the winds of market change are about to blow? These are some indicators I like to watch.

The Bigger Picture: The Fed & Price Ratios

Beyond the US equity markets, there is more going on behind the scenes that can come into play. In my opinion the Federal Reserve has been keeping money extremely cheap for an extended period of time.  The Fed wants to stimulate the economy and encourage job growth. Recently low inflation has allowed the Fed to stay on this path.  This works very well for the US treasury also since low interest rates keep the US Government balance sheet solvent and interest expenses manageable.  It has also allowed banks the time needed to replenish balance sheets and squeeze out the bad debt on their books. 

Earnings are usually necessary to allow equities to sustain long-term values.  Generally, the price of a security today is the sum of all future discounted cash flows into perpetuity.  When earnings are stable and getting better and money is cheap this allows for higher price multiples like we are seeing today.  We are at or near the highest price ratios ever witnessed in the US equity markets.  The following chart is measuring the price to many other gauges of earnings cash flow and book value over the last 65 years.  It’s not much different if you view it over the last 200 years.

Ratios of various equity valuations

Ratios of various equity valuations

We are at this point in history because of cheap money, cheap labor and now even cheap energy (which is more of a positive shock).  Money, Labor and energy are the 3 main expenses that go into every income statement of most companies in the country. The next two charts give a valuation of corporate equities values to nominal GDP (price of publicly traded companies/gross domestic product)  the important thing to see here is that the chart is indicating very high prices compared to output from a historical standpoint.

The next chart below is very similar depiction of valuation. Each point on the chart is the price of S&P 500 stocks at that point in time divided by the previous 10 years of earnings for the S&P 500.

Shiller P/E for the S&P 500 Chart

Shiller P/E for the S&P 500 Chart

More Indicators to Watch

From a historical standpoint, these 3 expenses for companies are close to, if not at, the lowest they have been for a generation or two.  It’s hard to see how it can get much better. On top of that, we have moderate energy prices again.  That indicates that earnings should be fantastic (and they are), but what's next?  When the cost of money increases and labor costs rise again (as projected for later this year or early 2016 in the chart below) we could see the earnings improvements slow and possibly fall.  And what if there is any type of energy shock the other way (and there always is eventually)?

The following chart from GMO provides some understanding of the last 50 years of initial unemployment claims.  When initial claims are high, we are usually deep into a recession. When they are rising, we are usually entering a recession. And when they are near the level we see today, the labor force is beginning to tighten, which typically leads to wage inflation and motivates the fed to increase interest rates and slow the economy down from overheating.

This chart is initial claims for unemployment 1965 to present.

This chart is initial claims for unemployment 1965 to present.

Winds of Change?

The wind, which has been blowing behind us for so long, has allowed us to feel confident, but it’s beginning to slow considerably from some of the indicators I watch.  Over the next year we could see the economic winds actually begin to blow at us.  On top of that some don’t see a lot of room for upside in US equities over the next 7 years as shown in the chart below.  Those at GMO have forecast for US equities to have negative returns after counting for inflation.  So, if you haven’t recently, now may be the time to review your portfolio allocation, time frame and risk tolerance with your advisor.

Matthew E. Chope, CFP ® is a Partner and Financial Planner at Center for Financial Planning, Inc. Matt has been quoted in various investment professional newspapers and magazines. He is active in the community and his profession and helps local corporations and nonprofits in the areas of strategic planning and money and business management decisions. In 2012 and 2013, Matt was named to the Five Star Wealth Managers list in Detroit Hour magazine.


Five Star Award is based on advisor being credentialed as an investment advisory representative (IAR), a FINRA registered representative, a CPA or a licensed attorney, including education and professional designations, actively employed in the industry for five years, favorable regulatory and complaint history review, fulfillment of firm review based on internal firm standards, accepting new clients, one- and five-year client retention rates, non-institutional discretionary and/or non-discretionary client assets administered, number of client households served.

This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Any opinions are those of Matthew Chope, CFP® and not necessarily those of Raymond James. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but Raymond James does not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), commonly known as “The Dow” is an index representing 30 stock of companies maintained and reviewed by the editors of the Wall Street Journal. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.