Asset Flow Watch 2Q 2017

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson

One of the most common ways to monitor consumer confidence and investor sentiment is to watch fund inflows and outflows. Market analysts use fund flows to measure sentiment within asset classes, sectors, or markets. This information (combined with other economic indicators) help identify trends and determine investment opportunities.

A new trend may be emerging as international fund flows are outpacing US fund flows in the second quarter. The move towards taxable bonds that began in January 2017 continued as investors have handled high U.S. stock valuations gingerly.

Asset Flows: What Investors Did This Quarter

An even distribution of flows went towards taxable bonds and international equities in April. The fear of France’s exit from the European Union dissipated as Emmanuel Macron won the French presidential elections. Accordingly, flows moved into foreign large blend funds. To boot, MSCI Emerging Markets Index returns (13.9%) increased inflows to diversified emerging markets. On the other hand, first quarter GDP growth (0.7%) and political unpredictability sucked life from post-election US equity inflows. 

By May, US equity deceleration evolved into outflows. International equity flows remained strong.  Taxable bond flows continued in spite of raised rates. Republican tax cut plans created municipals bond outflows; likely because investors don’t think federal tax exemptions will be as advantageous as they have been in the past. 

Early quarter trends have continued through June. As of June 21, 2017, US equity outflows were -$1.205 billion, international equity inflows were $1.467 billion, emerging markets inflows were $0.300 billion, and taxable bond inflows were $3.016 billion.

Is the US Equity Run Over?

While the debate about the end of the US equity run ensues among industry professionals, the discussion may be mute among investors. It appears that many investors, figuring the US recovery is further along than the rest of the world, have opted to either “play it conservative” with bonds or invest internationally where there is seemly more opportunity for equity values to grow.

Jaclyn Jackson is a Portfolio Administrator and Financial Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®

---

This information does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material; it has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making and investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Asset allocation does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. The MSCI Emerging Markets is designed to measure equity market performance in 25 emerging market indices. The index's three largest industries are materials, energy, and banks. Please note direct investment in any index is not possible.

Investment Pulse: Q2 Edition

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

It has been another busy quarter! Check out some of our meeting highlights!

Andrew Adams, Senior Research Associate to both Raymond James Chief Investment Strategist as well as its Chief Economist

The Center had a chance to hear firsthand from one of Raymond James leading research associates. Andrew Adams paid a visit to our office this month to discuss the global market outlook. Andrew discussed how Raymond James believes that the U.S. equity market is still in the middle innings of a longer-term secular bull market that is more reminiscent of the post-WWII era and the 1982-2000 bull market than that of the 2000s decade. In response to questions about how the market could continue to go up without a major pullback, Andrew discussed that although the market pullback in the winter of 2016 was not technically a bear market (the S&P 500, which is heavily weighted towards large-cap tech stocks, only declined 15.1%), the average stock in the S&P 500 did decline 25% during that period. Andrew explained that Raymond James remains cautiously optimistic about U.S. equity markets going forward.

Scott Davis, Portfolio Manager of Columbia Dividend Income Fund

Scott gave us an update on where he sees markets now. Debt has been steadily expanding which indicates to him it is particularly important not to give up on quality at this stage of the market. Eight straight years of equity market gains make this the second oldest bull market since World War II. The run-up in stock prices also makes stocks expensive relative to corporate earnings growth, a potential risk factor going forward in his eyes. As the margin for safety has narrowed, he believes that any miss on expectations is likely to be punished, which makes careful stock selection even more important. That being said, Scott believes the American consumer is in good shape, and an expanding economy continues to provide a favorable environment for the equity market.

James Cook, Equity Specialist from Hermes Investment Management in London

This was our first conversation with the London-based firm. We were excited to discuss their Emerging Market strategy. This is the only dedicated Emerging Market strategy with an ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) mandate available to us. He spoke to us about the importance to remember that Emerging Markets aren’t a homogenous region. The sector is made up of very different countries spread all over the world that are driven by dissimilar factors. Many investors think that it is a space highly correlated to movements in commodities, which is true for some countries and company’s but not all. They apply research held to a developed market standard that they apply to emerging markets giving them a bias for high-quality positions.

That’s what our Investment Department has been up to for the second quarter of 2017. Please stay tuned to other insights throughout our Investment Week!

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

Raymond James is not affiliated with and does not endorse the opinions of Scott Davis or James Cook. The foregoing information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor’s results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Please note that international investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss. There is no guarantee that any statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct.

First Quarter Investment Commentary

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

U.S. markets continued to enjoy positive returns for the first part of the year as the Trump rally extended through February. We began to see a small amount of volatility creep back into the market as March wore on and investors were left to continue to wait and see if there was any progress on economic and corporate friendly Trump policies. The S&P 500 ended the quarter in positive territory, up over 6%, while Bonds ended up just shy of 1% at .82% for the quarter, according to the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index. Developed international was the clear winner, up 7.25% on the quarter, for the MSCI EAFE Index. Economic data continues to flow in, sending a strong signal that the U.S. economy is healthy and sustainable.

Europe headlines ended the quarter centered on the long awaited invoking of Article 50. While purely a political event rather than a market-moving event, the trigger marks a point of no return for the split between the United Kingdom and the European Union.  The two year countdown on Brexit begins—get your popcorn and settle in to watch!

Steady Headwinds for Interest Rates Ahead

The Federal Reserve is proactively increasing interest rates this year and has begun with the first interest rate increase of the year in March. What is overlooked, though, is all of the assets still on the balance sheet from years of quantitative easing (QE), the process which the Fed has used to increase money in the economy by buying treasury bonds and flushing the system with liquidity. 

In addition to raising interest rates, The Fed will also continue its reverse QE process by letting the bonds they purchased simply mature and roll off the books, essentially taking that liquidity out of the system. Below, you will see a chart by maturity date for the rate this will happen. Because of the lumpy distribution of maturity dates, it is likely the Fed may try to smooth out this maturing process through a combination of letting the bonds mature and outright selling. This would prevent any one month or year from having an outsized event of pulling liquidity out of the economy, leading to bond volatility.

Source: JP Morgan

Auf wiedersehen T+3! 

In March, the SEC voted unanamously to shorten the trade settling cycle from a maximum of three days down to two. In the day and age of instant gratification, investors have been left scratching their heads wondering why they have to wait the traditional trade date plus three business days in order for the cash and securities to officially change hands after they trade. That meant that if you needed to withdraw funds from your account, you had to wait nearly one week after selling a security to receive a check. That wait will now be reduced by one day! While the biggest benefit is for you, the invester, we will notice there also may be other “behind the scenes” benefits. Some examples include:  reducing credit and counterparty risk, increased market liquidity, and lowering collateral requirements. This is slated to take effect on September 5th of this year.

Investment Pulse: Check out Investment Pulse, by Angela Palacios, CFP®, a summary of investment-focused meetings for the quarter.

Investor Ph.D Series: 6 Points you should know about Technical Analysis: Fool’s errand or secret sauce?

Investor Basics Series: Nick Boguth, Investment Research Associate, introduces us to Fundamental Investing

Of Financial Note:  Jaclyn Jackson, Portfolio Coordinator, continues her series on behavioral investing here.

It is important to remember, even with markets up, not to become complacent with your portfolio. While many investors become laser-focused on their statements when volatility strikes, it is important to remember there is a laundry list of items that are best addressed when markets have been positive for an extended period of time:

• Plan for upcoming cash needs

• Rebalance portfolios

• Make your charitable contributions

• Don’t ditch your plan!

If you have questions surrounding any of these points, don’t hesitate to reach out to us! We are here to help! At The Center, we want to help each and every one of our clients to take charge of their financial futures. Newsletters, blogs, webinars and more can be found on our website to help you do so. This is all part of Living Your Plan™.  Thank you for placing your trust in us!

Angela Palacios, CFP®

Director of Investments

Financial Advisor

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. This information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios, CFP®, and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy or strategies employed. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), commonly known as “The Dow” is an index representing 30 stock of companies maintained and reviewed by the editors of the Wall Street Journal. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate bond market. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 21 developed nations. Please note direct investment in an index is not possible. Index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Investor Ph.D. Series: 6 points you should know about Technical Analysis

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

While most often investors apply fundamental analysis when picking a suitable security to invest in, a less widely used strategy called technical analysis could be just as important. 

Why would you use it?

Here’s the scenario: you’ve researched and decided, “There is a strategy I have to invest in.” Perhaps it is a company that makes a widget and you think, “This is the best widget ever made and it is going to change everyone’s life!” Fundamental analysis helps you decide if Widget Producer A or Widget Producer B is the better-run company that is worthy of your investment dollars. But, does it matter what price you pay for that investment? Yes! This is where technical analysis can play a role in your portfolio decision making.

What is it?

Technical analysis, at its most basic level, only looks at supply and demand for a security. It attempts to find a trend or pattern in the price movement and volume of a traded security and decide if that trend is more likely to continue or reverse course.

How does it work?

Understanding basic assumptions behind technical analysis can be a key concept. First, it assumes that markets are efficient at all times; meaning everything that can be known about a company is known by all investors and reflected in the current price at which it is trading. Second, security prices move in trends; or, essentially, an object in motion stays in motion (or is much more likely to in the future). Third, history repeats itself. Investor behavior that caused prior patterns to occur is assumed to still be present and will likely repeat.

Which indicators are most commonly followed?

There are many indicators you can pick from when conducting technical research. Most investors that do this type of analysis have their favorites that fit with their own unique investing style. Some examples are: moving averages, volume, Oscillators, Bollinger Bands, Fibonacci levels, trend lines or relative strength.

Where can I find this information?

There are many resources that have a “fee for service” out there that can be used to conduct technical analysis. Yahoo! Finance, on the other hand, is a free resource available online for anyone to view. Their interactive charts help make it easy to view many of the most common indicators with the click of a button.

Can anyone do this?

Yes! However, it can take time, consistency, skill, and experience to be able to do technical analysis well; and even then, so-called “experts” can get it wrong quite often.

While there is no silver bullet in investing, blending both fundamental and technical analysis can help investors toward a potentially better outcome. Is this a fool’s errand or the potential secret sauce? I will leave that up to the individual to decide!

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Investor Basics: Intro to Fundamental Analysis

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth

There are two major types of analysis when it comes to investing: Technical Analysis, which you can read more about in Angela Palacios', CFP®, Investor PhD blog, and Fundamental Analysis, which I will break down for you right now.

Ultimately, fundamental analysis is an evaluation of the financial position and performance of a company or strategy.

When doing fundamental analysis on a stock, the process involves breaking down all of the quantitative information found on the company’s financial statements. Digging into a company’s balance sheet tells you about their current position as it pertains to assets, liabilities, and shareholders’ equity. The information on income statements and statements of cash flow reveals how the company has performed, or how much expense, revenue, or profit it generated. Fundamental analysis also involves looking at qualitative factors such as management, the business model, accounting practices, and competitors. All of this data is then analyzed, compared to peers, and used to make an investment decision.

The graphic above lays out The Center’s investment selection process. You will see that there is both quantitative and qualitative fundamental analysis done when choosing the strategies in our model. The process is slightly different when comparing all strategies as opposed to only stocks, but the same considerations have to be taken into account before making an investment decision. We look at quantitative factors such as manager tenure, ownership, costs, risk metrics, and return metrics, just to name a few. We also look at a vast amount of qualitative information about the fund companies, managers, and investment team. Fundamental analysis is step one to selecting each individual strategy for our portfolios. If you have questions on how we build portfolios or fundamental analysis, please reach out to our investment team!

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Every investor's situation is unique and you should consider your investment goals, risk tolerance and time horizon before making any investment. Prior to making an investment decision, please consult with your financial advisor about your individual situation.

Asset Flow Watch: First Quarter 2017

Contributed by: Jaclyn Jackson

The U.S. economy showed improvement, even before last year’s election, and data since continues to trend well. Overall, consumer confidence and optimism remained high with the Trump administration policy most of the first quarter. One of the most common ways to monitor consumer confidence and investor sentiment is to watch fund inflows and outflows. Market analysts use fund flows to measure investor sentiment within asset classes, sectors, or markets. This information (combined with other economic indicators) helps savvy investors identify trends and determine potential investment opportunities.

Asset Flows: What Investors Did This Quarter

This quarter, investor demand increased in global stocks and taxable bonds. While at a slower pace, the Trump agenda (lower taxes, infrastructure spending, deregulation, etc.) continued to lure investors into US equities. In February, US equities saw double the flows they’d received in January (reflecting fewer outflows from active managers). Hopeful economic data from Europe generated inflows for international equities, which primarily went to passive strategies. Yet, the most divergent trend from 2016’s fourth quarter is that fixed income flows started a comeback with a favor toward taxable bonds, specifically, intermediate term bonds. In spite of looming rate-hikes, March 31st ended as fixed income’s twelfth consecutive week of inflows.

Forward Steps

We’ve witnessed post-election equity runs correlated with the anticipation of “business-beneficial” tax and regulation reform. Nonetheless, the House’s inability to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act leaves doubt that the Trump agenda will progress as expected. Late 2016’s boost in stock returns could have overweighed portions of your equity allocation. At the same time, you may have also noticed a decrease or underweight to your bond allocation. Consider rebalancing back to your target allocation. In the face of Trump agenda uncertainty, rebalancing should help protect recent capital growth accumulation. As always, if you have questions or concerns when it comes to your portfolio, we are always happy to help!

Jaclyn Jackson is a Portfolio Administrator and Financial Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.®

---

This information does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material; it has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that it is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Jaclyn Jackson and are not necessarily those of Raymond James. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making and investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. Investing involves risk, investors may incur a profit or loss regardless of the strategy or strategies employed. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Rebalancing a non-retirement account could be a taxable event that may increase your tax liability. Asset allocation does not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

First Quarter Investment Pulse

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

During the first quarter of the year, managers and strategists are eager to travel and get the word out on what they think is to come in the New Year. This quarter was no exception. Here is a summary of some of the standout guest speakers we were able to host at the Center!

Priscilla Hancock, Global Fixed Income Strategist of JP Morgan

Priscilla Hancock stopped by to visit our office to discuss the current state of the municipal bond market. Priscilla’s insight into this market is both logical and insightful. She discussed that, for the most part, municipal bonds are less expensive now. Investors often worry about the performance of their municipal bonds in an environment of falling tax rates—which it seems we are on the verge of. Investors have sold off the space recently for that reason. But she has found there is very little to no correlation between municipal bond performance and tax rates over the long term. The municipal bond market is driven primarily by the retail investor, so you or I. We can benefit from the tax-advantaged status that the interest from municipal bonds produces. As rates fall, municipal bonds tend not to experience as much price appreciation because retail investors focus more on the yield a bond provides rather than the total return aspect they can provide. So as rates fall, the retail investor tends to sell. As rates rise, they experience the opposite effect. Rates then start to look attractive again, so investors may resume buying and help prevent prices declining, as much as treasuries, while rates rise.

Wendell Birkhofer, Senior Vice President, Investment Policy Committee Member of Dodge & Cox

Wendell Birkhofer brought Dodge & Cox’s unique value-based outlook to discuss equity markets both here in the U.S. and abroad. They are seeing value in financials here in the U.S. and also in Europe. Regulation changes and interest rate increases are a couple of the market forces that tend to be favorable to bank stocks—and are occurring right now. There is pent-up cash on hand at banks that could potentially get paid to shareholders in the future—if regulations loosen under the new Trump administration. In the U.S. markets, they see middling valuations (although some pockets are expensive). This tends to be a favorable environment for active management over passive management from their perspective. They also continue to find good value in emerging markets, while countries like Japan still struggle with corporate governance headwinds.

Ted Chen, Portfolio Manager and Aditya Bindal, Ph.D, Chief Risk Officer with Water Island Capital

Short volatility and the illusion of diversification were the topics we discussed with Mr. Chen and Mr. Bindal. They shared their groundbreaking research on the topics to a packed conference room of Center staff. They discussed how since the 2008 market crisis, the volatility of volatility has been off the charts (this is how much the VIX, a measurement of volatility in the equity markets, has, itself, been volatile). The markets have seen volatility spikes to the tune of two standard deviation events fourteen times over the past nine years! Alternative investment strategies are supposed to be uncorrelated to equity markets; however, they showed us that during these volatility spikes, most investment strategies lost value. This is what they call “short volatility.” They went on to share that true alternative strategies should possess characteristics, such as: low beta, market neutrality, and a lack of correlation regardless of low or high volatility time periods. These concepts are something we explore in our own portfolio construction process, and they have given us some excellent food for thought to chew on in the coming months and years!

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Municipal securities typically provide a lower yield than comparably rated taxable investments in consideration of their tax-advantaged status. Investments in municipal securities may not be appropriate for all investors, particularly those who do not stand to benefit from the tax status of the investment. Please consult an income tax professional to assess the impact of holding such securities on your tax liability. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well-established foreign markets. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss. Alternative Investments involve substantial risks that may be greater than those associated with traditional investments and may be offered only to clients who meet specific suitability requirements, including minimum net worth tests. These risks include but are not limited to: limited or no liquidity, tax considerations, incentive fee structures, speculative investment strategies, and different regulatory and reporting requirements. There is no assurance that any investment will meet its investment objectives or that substantial losses will be avoided. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. This material is being provided for information purposes only and is not a complete description, nor is it a recommendation. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Raymond James is not affiliated with Priscilla Hancock, JP Morgan, Wendell Birkhofer, Dodge & Cox, Ted Chen, Aditya Bindal and/or Water Island Capital.

Fourth Quarter Investment Commentary

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

2016 has been the year of the stock market taking major geopolitical news in stride. From the UK Brexit vote to an unexpected Trump victory in the U.S. presidential election, the market has shrugged off some major news that could have jolted it in a very negative way. Equity markets, however, once again demonstrated their resilience, and along the way this has become the second longest bull market in US history as of April of 2016. The S&P 500 ended the year up strong returning 11.96%, while bonds gave back great returns in the first three quarters of the year (they were up 5.8% as of 9/30/16) to end up only 2.65% on the Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index. International markets continued to struggle as they were nearly flat in 2016 with a 1% return for the MSCI EAFE while emerging markets bounced back strongly returning 8.5% on the MSCI Emerging Markets index.

Source: JP Morgan

2017 is likely to usher in a market driven more by fiscal policy than by monetary policy. The Federal Reserve is anticipated to continue their slow pace of raising interest rates into the New Year while Trump takes office very soon and launches his 100 day action plan. So if you choose not to give up and move to Canada, here is what we are watching in the New Year!

Trump’s 100 Day Action Plan:

Donald Trump has plans to shake up many potential areas such as trade, Obamacare, immigration, education (common core), tax code, and infrastructure improvements. Political risk could amplify volatility globally, although it hasn’t yet. This populist movement as shown by Brexit and our own election (people fed up with the status quo) is a theme likely to continue abroad as France, Germany, and Holland will host their own elections in 2017. The U.S. dollar has reached its highest level in 14 years in the wake of the presidential election, and a strong dollar has traditionally been a headwind for the earnings of large companies with significant international exposure. Taken together, these factors tell a somewhat cautionary tale for equities going into 2017.

The Economy:

Our economy continues to chug along with unemployment at very low levels. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics as of November 2016 we were at 4.6% unemployment. We are considered at full employment now. This means that wage inflation is starting to pick up, although slowly, which could start to be reflected in the overall inflation rate creeping up in the U.S even though it has been subdued for an extended period of time. Inflation currently stands at 1.7% (bls.gov). 

A Note on Diversification:

2016 has tested our patience on diversification yet again. Locally, The U.S.’s flavor of the month benchmark has morphed from the S&P500 to the Dow as the benchmark to keep up with. Pure U.S. equity exposure has continued to drastically outperform a diversified portfolio to historically unusual levels. This year other asset classes have had the opportunity to shine as Emerging markets*, small cap equities** and high yield debt*** have also performed well. Diversification seems to once again be working after a long drought. We, at The Center, still see merit to utilizing a diversified approach when it comes to managing our investments. As geopolitical risk rears its ugly head around the world, it will likely be important to tap into the long-term returns of many different asset classes to hopefully limit portfolio volatility.

We understand that you need to retire and achieve your goals regardless of what markets are doing. This is why we build portfolios to be all weather and stick by our strategy of diversification as a sound long-term approach to investing. It is a task that we take very seriously and we thank you for your continued trust in us.

Checkout Investment Pulse, by Angela Palacios, CFP®, a summary of investment focused meetings for the quarter.

Does the order in which you achieve your average returns really matter?  Of course, it all depends.  Check out when the sequence of returns matter!

Nick Boguth, Investment Research Associate dives into the surprising reality of what it takes to dig out of the hole of negative returns.

Jaclyn Jackson, Portfolio Coordinator, discusses the trends of investor behavior during significant events over recent history.

If you have topics you would like us to cover in the future, please let us know! As always, we appreciate the opportunity to meet your financial planning and investment needs. Thank you!

Angela Palacios, CFP®
Director of Investments
Financial Advisor

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

* As measured by the MCSI EAFE Index
** As measured by the Russell 2000 Index
*** As measured by the Barclays Aggregate Bond Index
The information contained in this report does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios, CFP®, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. Diversification does not ensure a profit or guarantee against a loss. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. The Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA), commonly known as “The Dow” is an index representing 30 stock of companies maintained and reviewed by the editors of the Wall Street Journal. The Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index is a broad-based flagship benchmark that measures the investment grade, US dollar-denominated, fixed-rate taxable bond market. The MSCI EAFE (Europe, Australasia, and Far East) is a free float-adjusted market capitalization index that is designed to measure developed market equity performance, excluding the United States & Canada. The EAFE consists of the country indices of 22 developed nations. Investing in emerging markets can be riskier than investing in well established foreign markets. Investing involves risk and investors may incur a profit or a loss. International investing involves special risks, including currency fluctuations, differing financial accounting standards, and possible political and economic volatility.

Investor Ph.D.: Sequence of Returns

Contributed by: Angela Palacios, CFP®

When planning for our goals, we often think in terms of “What return will we average over time?” But does it matter what pattern these returns happen in? What if they are choppy or we experience very negative returns right before we need the money or as we are drawing it? The answer can be startlingly different depending on what phase of your goal you are in.

If you are accumulating for a future goal the sequence of how to help achieve your returns in general doesn’t matter as long as you average what you need at the end. Look at the following example:

Source: Blackrock

The chart below shows two 30-year income scenarios. The solid line shows a withdrawal plan that started off with three years of negative returns in a row. The dotted line repre­sents a withdrawal plan with the negative years at the end. Both plans started with $250,000 and both took out $12,500 per year inflated by 3% for inflation. No other actions were taken to manage income withdrawals. Both plans had a 6.6% average annual rate of return on the underlying investment for the 30-year period.

These nuances are why it is critical to work with a financial planner to plan for and pursue your goals!

Angela Palacios, CFP® is the Director of Investments at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® Angela specializes in Investment and Macro economic research. She is a frequent contributor The Center blog.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Angela Palacios, CFP®, and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected.

Investor Basics: Drawdowns 101

Contributed by: Nicholas Boguth

It is imperative to try to avoid major drawdowns when investing. This may seem intuitive, but let’s take a closer look.

Drawdown is a metric used to measure risk. It is a measure of the peak-to-trough decline of an investment or portfolio. Minimizing drawdown is arguably more important than seeking large returns when it comes to investing, and here is why:

Below is a simple chart showing the returns investors would need to get back to where they started if they lost 10%, 30%, and 50%. The math is relatively simple: if you start with $100 and proceed to lose 50%, you now have $50. In order to get back to the $100 that you started with, your $50 would have to gain $50, or increase by 100%.

So the math is simple, but who really cares about the hypothetical? Let’s look at how the S&P 500 actually performed compared to diversified portfolios during the drawdown that started in ’07. The chart below, from JPMorgan’s Guide to the Markets, shows how the S&P 500 lost over 50%, and took 3 FULL YEARS before it recovered back to its peak. Compare that to the 40/60 portfolio. Since the drawdown was significantly less, it was a much quicker recovery and broke even after just 6 months. This is why it is important to try to avoid major drawdowns when investing.

For a more in depth look on drawdowns and sequence of returns, check out the Investor PhD blog written by our Director of Investments, Angela Palacios, CFP®.

Nicholas Boguth is an Investment Research Associate at Center for Financial Planning, Inc.® and an Investment Representative with Raymond James Financial Services.

---

The information contained in this blog does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. Any opinions are those of Nick Boguth and not necessarily those of Raymond James. Expressions of opinion are as of this date and are subject to change without notice. There is no guarantee that these statements, opinions or forecasts provided herein will prove to be correct. Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or loss regardless of strategy selected. The S&P 500 is an unmanaged index of 500 widely held stocks that is generally considered representative of the U.S. stock market. Keep in mind that individuals cannot invest directly in any index, and index performance does not include transaction costs or other fees, which will affect actual investment performance. Individual investor's results will vary. Past performance does not guarantee future results.